Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume04Issue11-05

METHODOLOGICAL SUPPORT FOR PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN OF CYBERSOCIALIZATION OF STUDENTS BASED ON BLENDED EDUCATION

J. Matnazarov , Independent researcher, Uzbekistan

Abstract

In the 21st century, with the rapid development of science and technology, approaches to pedagogy have changed significantly. New teaching methods such as distance learning (DL), online learning (OL) and blended learning (BL) have come into focus. In recent years, blended learning (BM) has become increasingly popular as a new pedagogical approach, including in Uzbekistan, where its application is gradually increasing in universities. This study analyzes students' perceptions of blended learning, its benefits and challenges in the context of higher education in Uzbekistan. The results, based on questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, showed that students have a positive attitude towards BM, especially those who combine studies with family and work responsibilities. The main challenge remains access to the Internet, however, students were able to successfully utilize the benefits of both face-to-face (F2F) and online learning. The study also highlights the need for further study on the application of blended learning in the higher education system of Uzbekistan for its successful implementation and understanding.

Keywords

Blended learning (BL), higher education, online learning (OL)

References

Keengwe, J., & Kang, J.-J. (2013). Blended Learning in Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Springer.

Bluic, A., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Research Focus on Student Experience of E-Learning in Higher Education: A Case Study of Blended Learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(3), 241–252.

Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P., & Sorg, S. (2006). Blended Learning: The Evolution of Online and Face-to-Face Education from 2000–2005. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 195–208). Pfeiffer.

Kanuka, H., Brooks, C., & Saranchuk, N. (2009). Flexible Learning and the Role of Technology. In: G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Handbook of Blended Learning Environments (pp. 333-347). Athabasca University Press.

Graham, C. R. (2005). Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer.

Sharma, P. (2010). Blended Learning. ELT Journal, 64(4), 456–458.

Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘Blended Learning’ Be Redeemed?. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 17-26.

Driscoll, M., & Carliner, S. (2005). Advanced Web-Based Training Strategies: Unlocking Instructionally Sound Online Learning. Pfeiffer.

McGee, P., & Reis, A. (2012). Blended Course Design: A Synthesis of Best Practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(4), 7–22.

Hockly, N. (2018). Blended Learning. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 97-104). Wiley.

Mukhiddinova, M. (2023). ABOUT THE PRAGMATICS OF DEACTIVE PRONOUNS IN THE KOREAN LANGUAGE. SPAST Abstracts, 2(02).

Mukhiddinova, M. (2021). A question about pronouns in a Korean sentence. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, 10(9), 208-211.

Dek-Khenovna, K. N., & Batirovna, M. M. (2019). To the study of the role of pronouns and pronominal words in Korean language (on elementary level teaching material). Вестник науки и образования, (19-1 (73)), 47-52.

Mukhiddinova, M. PRONOUNS IN COMMUNICATIVE SENTENCES IN KOREAN. ТОШКЕНТ-2021, 52.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

J. Matnazarov. (2024). METHODOLOGICAL SUPPORT FOR PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN OF CYBERSOCIALIZATION OF STUDENTS BASED ON BLENDED EDUCATION. International Journal of Pedagogics, 4(11), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume04Issue11-05