UNDERSTANDING INTRINSIC MOTIVATION IN AMERICAN HIGH SCHOOL LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Abstract
This study, "Understanding Intrinsic Motivation in American High School Language Learners," explores the factors that contribute to intrinsic motivation in the context of language acquisition among high school students in the United States. Intrinsic motivation, characterized by engaging in an activity for its inherent satisfaction rather than external rewards, plays a critical role in the success and persistence of language learning.
The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to gather data from a diverse sample of high school language learners. The study investigates various elements that influence intrinsic motivation, including personal interests, perceived relevance of the language to students’ future goals, classroom environment, teaching methods, and cultural factors. Key findings indicate that intrinsic motivation is significantly driven by the alignment of language learning activities with students' personal interests and real-world applications. Positive classroom dynamics, supportive teacher-student relationships, and engaging, interactive teaching strategies also contribute to heightened intrinsic motivation.
The results underscore the importance of creating a learning environment that fosters students’ internal drive by incorporating meaningful, student-centered activities and connecting language learning to real-life contexts. The study also highlights the role of teachers in facilitating intrinsic motivation through personalized feedback, encouragement, and creating a supportive and stimulating classroom atmosphere.
Keywords
Intrinsic motivation, high school language learners, American studentsHow to Cite
References
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, Inc.
American Councils for International Education. (2017). The National K-16 foreign language enrollment survey report. Retrieved from https://www.americancouncils.org/sites/default/files/FLE-report.pdf
Au, W. (2011). Teaching under new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25-45.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of student self-regulation and instructor autonomy support on learning in a college-level natural science course: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756.
Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97-110.
Davis, W. S., & Bowles, F. (2018). Empowerment and intrinsic motivation: A self-determination theory approach to language teaching. CSCTFL Report, 15, 1-19. Retrieved from https://csctfl.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/2018Report/CSCTFL%20Report%202018.pdf
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). The paradox of achievement: The harder you push, the worse it gets. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education. (pp. 61-87). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Froiland, J. M., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school. Psychology in the Schools, 53(3), 321-336.
Gottfried, A. E., Gottfried, A. W., Morris, P. E., & Cook, C. R. (2008). Low academic intrinsic motivation as a risk factor for adverse educational outcomes: A longitudinal study from early childhood through early adulthood. In C. Hudley & A. E. Gottfried (Eds.), Academic motivation and the culture of school in childhood and adolescence. (pp. 36-39). Oxford, UK: Oxford.
Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2013). Observing physical education teachers’ need-supportive interactions in classroom settings. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 35(1), 3-17.
Hu, P., & Zhang, J. (2017). A pathway to learn autonomy: A self-determination theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(1), 147-157.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644-661.
Korthagen, A. J., & Evelein, F. G. (2016). Relations between student teachers’ basic needs fulfillment and their teaching behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 234-244.
Levesque, C., Zuehlke, A. N., Stanek, L. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 68-84.
McEown, M. S., Noels, K. A., & Saumure, K. D. (2014). Students’ self-determined and integrative orientations and teachers’ motivational support in a Japanese as a foreign language context. System, 45, 227-241.
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 William S. David
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.