Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume02Issue06-02

STUDY THE COMBINED PROGRESSIVE SYSTEM OF THE SCIENTIFIC CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING TARGETS IN FLIPPED CLASSROOM

Waly RB , Leibniz University Hannover, Germany

Abstract

The rise of computerized learning designs impacts the preparation and organizing of advanced instructing. Particularly in the midst of the Crown Pandemic, when numerous colleges stay shut, new advanced learning ideas are arising that can be coordinated into eye to eye showing in future. In this specific situation, old showing designs are frequently reexamined and addressed. However, while innovation just decides the type of joint effort, the genuine nature of learning relies upon mental preliminaries that the educator locations to the understudies. To group these preliminaries, an educator can utilize Sprout's updated scientific classification, which positions Learning Targets in a six-level request and expects a combined order: accomplishing a necessary Learning Objective level incorporates all lower levels. Particularly in mixed learning situations, for example, a Flipped Classroom, this hypothesis can be utilized to foster the course structure and to shape test questions. Notwithstanding, the pertinence of the total order is disputable in the writing and is seldom broke down in mixed learning courses. Our objective is in this way to confirm the combined pecking order in a Flipped Classroom Course and determine suggestions for activity. Subsequently, we utilize a quantitative composed overview. Since the investigation depends on the understudies' insights, these are checked by relationship examination with the genuine test results and the attention to items and exercises. A short time later, the total pecking order is tried by relapse examination of the various degrees of Learning Goals. Therefore, it very well may be affirmed for all levels, however not generally by direct yet frequently by aberrant impacts of different levels.

Keywords

Combined progressive system, mixed picking up, learning targets, learning ideas

References

Tauson, M. and Stannard, L. (2018). EdTech for learning in emergencies and displaced settings: a rigorous review and narrative synthesis. Save The Children, London.

Official Bulletin n 1, January 4, 2007. Specifications for the training of teachers in University Institute for Teachers' Training.

Decision of the Minister of National Education concerning the seats and annexes of the CRMEF, n 12.1866, March 15, 2012, Rabat.

Houlden, R. L., and Collier, C. P. 1999. “Learning Outcome Objectives: A Critical Tool in Learner‐centered Education,” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions (19:4), Wiley Online Library, pp. 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.1340190405.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Waly RB. (2022). STUDY THE COMBINED PROGRESSIVE SYSTEM OF THE SCIENTIFIC CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING TARGETS IN FLIPPED CLASSROOM. International Journal of Pedagogics, 2(06), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume02Issue06-02