UNVEILING COLLEGE STUDENTS PERSPECTIVE: EXPLORING THE FACTORS THAT DEFINE A WELL-QUALIFIED EDUCATOR
John Mark De Dios , La Consolacion University Philippines, Gordon College, PhilipinnesAbstract
This article delves into the perspectives of college students regarding the qualities and attributes that define a well-qualified educator. Recognizing the significance of effective teaching in higher education, understanding students' viewpoints is essential for professional development and quality improvement. By conducting surveys, interviews, and analyzing student feedback, this study aims to explore the factors that college students consider when evaluating an educator's qualifications. The findings provide valuable insights for educators, educational institutions, and policymakers to enhance teaching practices and promote student-centered learning environments.
Keywords
College students,, perspective,, well-qualified educator
References
• Alhija, F. N. A. (2017). Teaching in higher education: Good teaching through students’ lens. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 4-12.
• Amatea, E. S., Cholewa, B., Mixon, K. A. (2012). Influencing preservice teachers’ attitudes about working with low-income and/or ethnic minority families. Urban Education, 47(4), 801-834.
• Baric, D., & Burusic, J. (2014). Quality of religious education in Croatia assessed from teachers’ perspective. British Journal of Religious Education, 1-29.
• Bullock, M. (2015). What makes a good teacher? Exploring student and teacher beliefs on good teaching. Rising Tide, 7(1) 1-30.
• Coleman, L. J. (2014). “Being a teacher”: Emotions and optimal experiences while teaching gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(1) 5669.
• Chu, S. Y., (2011). Teacher efficacy beliefs toward serving culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education: Implications of a pilot study. Education and Urban Society, 45(3), 385- 410.
• J. M. R. Asio & E. E. R. de Dios / Journal of Pedagogical Research, 3(3), 126-138 137 Curwood, J. S. (2014). Between continuity and change: identities and narratives within teacher professional development. Teaching Education, 25(2), 156- 183.
• De Guzman, A. B., Uy, M., Siy, E. Y., Torres, R. K. C., Tancioco, J. B. F., & Hernandez, J. R. (2008). From teaching from the heart to teaching with a heart: Segmenting Filipino college students’ views of their teachers’ caring behavior and their orientations as cared-for individuals. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(4), 487-502.
• De Moraes, A. (2019). What does it mean to be an effective educator? Analyzing the qualities for a successful and interesting career as an educator in the 21st century. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 2(1), 75-78.
• Dueñas, G., Klash, E. F., & Bowden, S. H. (2019). The DNA of a professional educator. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 55(3), 140-142.
• Enanoza, F. L., & Anao, E. L. (2014). Roles and performance expectancies of a global teacher. European Scientific Journal, 10(1), 356-373.
• Espina, M. R. (2013). Instrument development: Defining the ideals and assessed college teacher. GSE Journal Education, 1, 110-124.
• Gargani, J., & Strong M., (2014). Can we identify a successful teacher better, faster and cheaper? Evidence for innovating teacher observation systems. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 389-401.
• Gu, Q. & Day C. (2013). Challenges to teacher resilience: conditions count. British Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 22-44.
• Harris, D. N., Ingle, W. K., & Rutledge, S. A. (2014). How teacher evaluation methods matter for accountability: A comparative analysis of teacher effectiveness ratings by principals and teacher value- added measures. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 73-112.
• Henry, G. T., Thompson, C. L., Campbell, S. L., Patriarca, L. A., Luterbach, K.J., Lys, D. B., & Covington, V. M. (2013). The predictive validity of measures of teacher candidate programs and performance: Toward and evidence-based approach to teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 439-453
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2023 John Mark De Dios
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.