Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home

International Journal of Pedagogics

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2281
Published Article

A Blended Learning Model for Teaching English Based on An LMS (Moodle/Google Classroom)

A Blended Learning Model for Teaching English Based on An LMS (Moodle/Google Classroom)

  • Ismatullayeva Robiyabonu
    Master’s student at Webster University, Uzbekistan
Blended learning Google Classroom English language teaching

The rapid growth of digital learning infrastructures has made blended learning a mainstream organizational form for language education. Yet many blended implementations remain technologically driven rather than pedagogically designed, resulting in fragmented activities, inconsistent feedback cycles, and limited gains in communicative competence. This article proposes and justifies a blended learning model for teaching English that is structurally anchored in a Learning Management System (LMS), with Moodle and Google Classroom considered as two widely used implementation environments. The results of the study are presented as a coherent model specification, including its pedagogical logic, learning sequence, content structuring principles, and indicators for evaluating effectiveness. The discussion emphasizes that the added value of an LMS-centered blended format emerges when the LMS functions as a single “learning spine” that unifies content, interaction, feedback, and evidence of progress, while classroom time is reserved for communicative practice and higher-order tasks. The article concludes with implications for course design, teacher professional development, and scalable quality assurance in English language education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Graham C. R. Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions // Bonk C. J., Graham C. R. (eds.) The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2006. P. 3–21.

Garrison D. R., Kanuka H. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education // The Internet and Higher Education. 2004. Vol. 7, No. 2. P. 95–105.

Horn M. B., Staker H. Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2015. 272 p.

Picciano A. G. Blended learning: Implications for growth and access // Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2009. Vol. 13, No. 1. P. 95–102.

Means B., Toyama Y., Murphy R., Bakia M., Jones K. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, 2010. 93 p.

Allen I. E., Seaman J., Garrett R. Blending In: The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2007. 45 p.

Laurillard D. Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. New York: Routledge, 2012. 272 p.

Biggs J., Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2011. 389 p.

Nicol D. J., Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice // Studies in Higher Education. 2006. Vol. 31, No. 2. P. 199–218.

Hattie J., Timperley H. The power of feedback // Review of Educational Research. 2007. Vol. 77, No. 1. P. 81–112.

Dörnyei Z. The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005. 270 p.

Ellis R. Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 387 p.

Richards J. C. Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 47 p.

Nation I. S. P., Macalister J. Language Curriculum Design. New York: Routledge, 2010. 232 p.

Mayer R. E. Multimedia Learning. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 304 p.

Zimmerman B. J. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview // Theory Into Practice. 2002. Vol. 41, No. 2. P. 64–70.

Mishra P., Koehler M. J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge // Teachers College Record. 2006. Vol. 108, No. 6. P. 1017–1054.

Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 260 p.

Stockwell G. Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Diversity in Research and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 244 p.

Chapelle C. A. Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for Teaching, Testing and Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 262 p.