Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home
Login

International Journal of Pedagogics

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2281
Published Article

Gamified Rubrics As An Innovative Tool For Self-Assessment In Higher Education

Gamified Rubrics As An Innovative Tool For Self-Assessment In Higher Education

Authors

  • Zilola Mahmudova Shukhrat qizi
    EFL teacher, Chirchik State Pedagogical University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume06Issue02-11

Keywords:

Gamified rubrics self-assessment higher education

Abstract

This study examines the use of gamified rubrics as an alternative approach to self-assessment in higher education, with a focus on their application in English language instruction. Based on theoretical perspectives of educational gamification, self-regulated learning, and reflective pedagogy, the research introduces a modified rubric design that incorporates visual elements, level-based progression, and achievement-oriented feedback. The study follows a qualitative, practice-based research design that includes classroom observations, analysis of students’ self-assessment artifacts, and reflective feedback collected during instructional practice.

The results demonstrate that the implementation of gamified rubrics leads to increased student engagement in self-assessment activities and promotes higher levels of reflective awareness. Learners demonstrated greater confidence in evaluating their own performance, a clearer understanding of assessment criteria, and less anxiety related to evaluation. The findings suggest that gamified rubrics can effectively reframe self-assessment as an interactive and learner-oriented process, thereby enhancing the overall quality of assessment practices in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allabergenova, M., & Mahmudova, Z. (2025). THE REFLECTION OF ANGLO-SAXON VALUES IN EARLY ENGLISH POETRY. Central Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 2(10), 193-195.

Andrade H. G., Du Y. Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment // Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. – 2005. – Vol. 10, No. 3. – P. 1–11.

Boud D., Falchikov N. Aligning assessment with long-term learning // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. – 2006. – Vol. 31, No. 4. – P. 399–413.

Hamari J., Koivisto J., Sarsa H. Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification // Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. – Honolulu, 2014. – P. 3025–3034.

Ismailova, M. Q. Q., & Mahmudova, Z. S. Q. (2025). TRANSLATION ISSUES IN WORLD AND UZBEK LITERATURE AND LITERARY TRANSLATION: RESEARCH, PROBLEMS, AND SOLUTIONS. Academic research in educational sciences, 6(NUU Conference Students 1), 395-399.

Kapp K. M. The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. – San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2012. – 336 p.

Nicol D. J., Macfarlane‐Dick D. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice // Studies in Higher Education. – 2006. – Vol. 31, No. 2. – P. 199–218.

Shute V. J., Rahimi S. Review of computer-based assessment for learning in educational games // Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. – 2017. – Vol. 33, No. 3. – P. 1–18.

To‘Raboyeva, S. E. Q., & Mahmudova, Z. S. Q. (2025). PSYCHOLOGICAL AND LINGUISTIC PECULIARITIES OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. Academic research in educational sciences, 6(NUU Conference Students 1), 45-49.