Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume06Issue01-37
Technology For Developing Information-Analytical Competence In Future Teachers: Indicators, Criteria, And Diagnostic Approaches
Abstract
Information-analytical competence has become a core requirement in modern teacher education, where the ability to locate, interpret, and critically evaluate information directly influences professional performance and decision-making. This article develops a comprehensive theoretical foundation for evaluating this competence by systematizing its key components, indicators, and criteria. Drawing on established conceptual models of information processing, critical reasoning, and analytical judgment, the paper outlines a structured framework that integrates cognitive, analytical, and operational dimensions. Special attention is given to defining clear indicators for information retrieval, source evaluation, analytical interpretation, and evidence-based decision-making. The article also proposes theoretically grounded diagnostic approaches-including analytic rubrics, criteria-based matrices, and structured assessment descriptors-that make it possible to evaluate information-analytical competence in a consistent and pedagogically meaningful manner. By synthesizing national pedagogical perspectives with international frameworks on information and media literacy, the paper offers a coherent model that enhances the conceptual clarity and practical applicability of competence evaluation in teacher training programs. The proposed framework contributes to the broader discourse on developing information-literate, analytically capable educators in an increasingly complex digital environment.
Keywords
Information-analytical competence, evaluation indicators, criteria, diagnostic model
References
Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Polity Press.
Eisenberg, M. B. (2008). Information problem-solving: The Big6 approach to library and information skills instruction. Library Media Connection, 26(6), 24–26.
Hobbs, R. (2017). Create to learn: Introduction to digital literacy. Wiley Blackwell.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2021). ISTE standards for educators. https://iste.org/standards/educators
Karimova, D. (2018). Theory and practice of developing pedagogical competencies. Fan Publishing.
Messick, S. (1984). The psychology of educational measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(3), 215–227.
Mirzaahmedov, H. (2017). Modern pedagogical competencies: Theory and practice. Tashkent State Pedagogical University Publishing.
OECD. (2019). OECD learning compass 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Shapiro, J. J., & Hughes, S. K. (1996). Information literacy as a liberal art. Educom Review, 31(2), 31–35.
Sobirova, N. (2020). Criteria for assessing pedagogical competencies. Innovation Ziyo Publishing.
UNESCO. (2021). Media and information literacy: Policy and strategy guidelines. https://unesdoc.unesco.org
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens (EUR 31006 EN). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–65). Hogrefe & Huber.
Yo‘ldoshev, J. (2015). Pedagogical mastery and professional competence. Teacher Publishing House.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Madaliev Bakhtiyorjon Egamberdi ugli

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.