Anticipating professional outcomes—the capacity to foresee potential consequences, risks, and opportunities in future work settings—is a higher-order competence increasingly demanded across knowledge-intensive professions. This article proposes and examines a pedagogical framework for cultivating such anticipatory skills through reflective thinking within undergraduate philosophy courses. Drawing on scholarly traditions of reflective practice, metacognition, experiential learning, and constructive alignment, the study articulates a theory-informed model that integrates three interlocking components: reflexive conceptualization, scenario-based philosophical inquiry, and structured metacognitive regulation. The methodology employs a design-based approach implemented over one semester in two cohorts (N=128) of education and humanities undergraduates. Data were gathered using a mixed set of instruments: a rubric for anticipatory reasoning, reflective journals, think-aloud protocols, and performance on authentic assessment tasks mapped to professional standards. Results indicate significant gains in students’ ability to project likely consequences, articulate assumptions, weigh ethical trade-offs, and generate alternative courses of action under uncertainty. Qualitative evidence shows that philosophy-anchored reflection—especially dialectical argumentation around real-world cases—supports transfer of foresight skills to domain-specific contexts such as classroom management, policy analysis, and organizational decision-making. The discussion situates these findings within broader debates on employability and the role of philosophy in professional education, highlighting design principles for instructors: embed authentic futures-oriented problems, scaffold reflective cycles with explicit metacognitive prompts, and align assessments with anticipatory criteria. The article concludes that philosophy, when taught as reflective inquiry into concepts, values, and reasoning patterns, offers a distinctive pathway to develop students’ anticipatory competence needed for responsible, evidence-sensitive professional action.  

Reflective thinking, anticipatory competence, professional outcomes

Dewey J. How We Think. Boston: D.C. Heath, 1933. 301 p.

Schön D.A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, 1983. 374 p.

Flavell J.H. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving // The Nature of Intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976. P. 231–236.

Kolb D.A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984. 256 p.

Biggs J. Constructive alignment in university teaching // HERDSA Review of Higher Education. 2014. Vol. 1. P. 5–22.

Brookfield S.D. Developing Critical Thinkers: Challenging Adults to Explore Alternative Ways of Thinking and Acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987. 324 p.

Moon J.A. Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice. London: Kogan Page, 1999. 232 p.

Boud D., Keogh R., Walker D. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. London: Kogan Page, 1985. 186 p.

Facione P.A. Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment, 2011. 28 p.

Paul R., Elder L. Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2002. 347 p.

Halpern D.F. Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. New York: Psychology Press, 2014. 480 p.

van de Heijden K. Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. 356 p.

Ramírez R., Wilkinson A. Strategic Reframing: The Oxford Scenario Planning Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 272 p.

Ericsson K.A., Charness N., Feltovich P.J., Hoffman R.R. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 918 p.

Zimmerman B.J. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview // Theory Into Practice. 2002. Vol. 41. No. 2. P. 64–70.