
Navigating the Social Classroom: The Interplay of Inhibitory Control and Peer Acceptance in Young Learners
Abstract
Background: Social acceptance by peers is a cornerstone of a child's school experience, influencing their academic motivation, well-being, and overall adjustment. Concurrently, inhibitory control—a core executive function enabling the suppression of prepotent responses—is critical for self-regulation and goal-directed behavior. While deficits in inhibitory control are linked to negative social behaviors, the direct relationship between well-developed inhibitory control and the positive outcome of peer social acceptance remains an important area of inquiry. This study aimed to investigate the direct association between inhibitory control ability and social acceptance in a sample of young learners.
Methods: A cross-sectional design was employed with 168 elementary school students (Mean age = 9.1 years; 49.4% female). Inhibitory control was assessed using performance-based measures, including the Color-Word Interference Test (Stroop) and relevant subtests from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). Social acceptance was measured using a peer nomination technique, where students identified classmates they most liked to work and play with, yielding a social preference score for each participant.
Results: Descriptive statistics revealed wide variation in both inhibitory control and social acceptance scores. Pearson correlation analysis indicated a significant, positive relationship between inhibitory control and peer acceptance (r = .48, p < .001). Furthermore, multiple regression analysis demonstrated that inhibitory control was a significant unique predictor of social acceptance (β = .51, p < .001), even after controlling for age and gender. Students with higher inhibitory control consistently received more positive peer nominations.
Conclusion: The findings provide strong evidence that inhibitory control is significantly linked to a child's social standing in the classroom. This suggests that the ability to regulate impulses is a fundamental cognitive mechanism that supports the development and maintenance of positive peer relationships. These results highlight the potential for educational interventions targeting executive functions to not only improve academic readiness but also to foster a child's social integration and well-being.
Keywords
Inhibitory Control, Social Acceptance, Peer Relationships
References
Albaladejo-García, C., García-Aguilar, F., & Moreno, F. J. (2023). The role of inhibitory control in sport performance: Systematic review and meta-analysis in stop-signal paradigm. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 147, 105108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105108
Allen, K. A., Vella-Brodrick, D., Waters, L., & Kern, M. L. (2021). School belonging and academic motivation in secondary school students. Educational Psychology, 41(5), 611-628. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1917529
Ananthavalli, B. (2024). The role of inhibitory control in academic performance and behavioral regulation among school students. Educational Administration Theory and Practice Journal, 30(2), 5289-5293.
Babinčák, P., Mikulášková, G., & Kovalčíková, I. (2012). Reliability, factor structure and construct validity of Harter's self-perception profile for children. Československá psychológia, 56(5), 448-462.
Ballara, N. B. (2023). The power of social validation: A literature review on how likes, comments, and shares shape user behavior on social media. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 4(7), 3355-3367. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.4.723.51227
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Bartholomew, M. E., Heller, W., & Miller, G. A. (2019). Inhibitory control of emotional processing: Theoretical and empirical considerations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 163, 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.11.005
Berry, D. (2011). Inhibitory control and teacher-child conflict: Reciprocal associations across the elementary-school years. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 66-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.10.002
Blake, P. R., Piovesan, M., Montinari, N., Warneken, F., & Gino, F. (2014). Prosocial norms in the classroom: The role of self-regulation in following norms of giving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.10.004
Blair, C. (2016). Executive function and early childhood education. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.05.009
Boehnke, K. (2008). Peer pressure: A cause of scholastic underachievement? A cross-cultural study of mathematical achievement among German, Canadian, and Israeli middle school students. Social Psychology of Educatio1n, 11(2), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-007-9041-z
Bonham, M. D., Shanley, D. C., Waters, A. M., & Elvin, O. M. (2020). Inhibitory control deficits in children with oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder compared to attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 49(1), 39-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00670-3
Cardinale, E. M., Subar, A. R., Brotman, M. A., Leibenluft, E., Kircanski, K., & Pine, D. S. (2019). Inhibitory control and emotion dysregulation: A framework for research on anxiety. Development and Psychopathology, 31(3), 859-869. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579419000348
Chacko, A., Merrill, B. M., Kofler, M. J., & Fabiano, G. A. (2024). Improving the efficacy and effectiveness of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. Translational Psychiatry, 14(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-02742-0
Cillessen, A. H. N., & van den Berg, Y. H. M. (2012). Popularity and school adjustment. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 135-164). IAP Information Age Publishing.
Coelho, V. A., Marchante, M., & Sousa, V. (2015). "Positive Attitude": A multilevel model analysis of the effectiveness of a social and emotional learning program for Portuguese middle school students. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.009
Delis, D., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. (2001). The Delis-Kaplan executive function system. The Psychological Corporation.
Dicataldo, R., Moscardino, U., Roch, M., & Mammarella, I. C. (2023). Inhibitory control, social cognition, and peer social competence among children with and without a migration background in Italy. Education Sciences, 13(7), 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070651
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Alistair Finch, Prof. Helena Vance

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.