Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume05Issue06-29

Cognitive and Linguistic Foundations of Using Modal Expressions in Spoken Language

Olimova Sharifabonu Siddiqovna , Department of Uzbek language and literature, Russian and English languages,Bukhara State Medical Institute, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article explores the linguocognitive principles underlying the use of modal units in speech, focusing on the interplay between language, thought processes, and social interactions. Modal units, including modal verbs such as "can," "may," "must," and "should," serve to convey nuances of possibility, necessity, permission, and ability. The discussion highlights the cognitive foundations of modality, examining how these linguistic tools reflect human reasoning and decision-making. It further delves into the pragmatic implications of modal usage in communication, illustrating how speakers navigate social dynamics and cultural norms through their choice of modality.  By understanding the multifaceted nature of modality, this exploration contributes to a deeper appreciation of language as a dynamic system that reflects cognitive capacities and social realities in various contexts.  

Keywords

Linguocognitive principles, modal units, modality

References

Goldberg, A. E., R. Jackendoff. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language, 2004.80,–Р. 532–568.

Hoekstra T.Small Clause Results // Lingua. 1988. № 74. –P. 101-139.

Jackendoff R. Conceptual semantics and cognitive linguistics // Language, № 7. 1996; 104, –Р 93129.

Jackendoff R. Semantic structures. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. USA. 1990. –312p.

Levin B., RappaportM. The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: The perspective from unaccusativity”. In I.M. Roca (ed), Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992.–P. 247-269.

Rappaport Hovav, Malka, Beth Levin. An event structure account of English resultatives.Language 77: 2001. –Р.766-797.

Rappaport T. R. Secondary Predication and the Lexical Representation of Verbs //Machine Translation 5, 1990. –P.31-55.

Rappaport Hovav, Malka, Beth Levin. 1996. Two types of derived accomplishments // Proceedings of the First LFG Workshop, ed. by Miriam Butt and Tracy H. King.Retrieved June 22, 2013, from http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/1/toc-lfg1.html.

Sweetser, E. (1990). *From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure*. Cambridge University Press.

Palmer, F. R. (2001). *Mood and Modality*. Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, J. (2010). *Language, Usage and Cognition*. Cambridge University Press.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Olimova Sharifabonu Siddiqovna. (2025). Cognitive and Linguistic Foundations of Using Modal Expressions in Spoken Language. International Journal of Pedagogics, 5(06), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume05Issue06-29