Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume05Issue06-15

Developing the Didactic Competence of Future History Teachers Through Innovative Methods

Xujanova Lobar Raimkulovna , Gulistan State University, Uzbekistan

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of digital technologies, constructivist learning paradigms, and competency-based standards has transformed expectations of teacher preparation programmes worldwide. Within this evolving landscape, the didactic competence of future history educators—understood as the integrated capacity to design, implement, and critically reflect on learning experiences that cultivate historical thinking—emerges as a pivotal quality benchmark. This article explores how innovative instructional methods, including project-based inquiry, flipped classroom design, and immersive digital simulations, shape the formation of didactic competence among pre-service history teachers at Gulistan State University. Employing a convergent mixed-methods design, the study triangulates quantitative gains in competency self-assessment scores with qualitative insights drawn from lesson‐plan analyses and reflective journals produced during a semester-long intervention. Results indicate that systematic exposure to innovation-centred pedagogy significantly elevates pre-service teachers’ mastery of content contextualisation, formative assessment strategies, and student-centred orchestration techniques. However, uneven digital literacy and restricted access to classroom technologies moderate these outcomes, underscoring the necessity of targeted infrastructure investment and sustained mentorship. The article concludes that an integrated approach aligning methodological innovation with reflective practice and institutional support offers a viable pathway for developing robust didactic competence in future history teachers.  

Keywords

Didactic competence, teacher education, history pedagogy

References

Dewey J. Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan; 1916. 434 p.

Shulman L.S. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching // Educational Researcher. 1986. Vol. 15, No 2. P. 4-14.

Dooly M., Sadler R. Becoming little scientists: technological affordances for peer‐collaborative inquiry // Language Learning & Technology. 2020. Vol. 24, No 2. P. 1-22.

Jonassen D.H. Learning to solve problems with technology: a constructivist perspective. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2015. 454 p.

Ministry of Preschool and School Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan. National curriculum for general secondary education. Tashkent: MPSSE; 2022. 112 p.

Hmelo-Silver C.E., Duncan R.G., Chinn C.A. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark // Educational Psychologist. 2007. Vol. 42, No 2. P. 99-107.

Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change. 5th ed. New York: Teachers College Press; 2021. 338 p.

Kozhanov K., Nazirjanova M. Integrating digital simulations in Uzbek teacher training: a pilot study // Central Asian Journal of Pedagogy. 2023. Vol. 5, No 4. P. 67-83.

Mishra P., Koehler M.J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge // Teachers College Record. 2006. Vol. 108, No 6. P. 1017-1054.

UNESCO. Futures of education: learning to become. Paris: UNESCO Publishing; 2021. 185 p.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Xujanova Lobar Raimkulovna. (2025). Developing the Didactic Competence of Future History Teachers Through Innovative Methods. International Journal of Pedagogics, 5(06), 52–55. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume05Issue06-15