
Analysis of the 4+2 System in The Professional Training of Students
Abstract
The article analyzes experiments conducted at Namangan State Pedagogical Institute, Andijan State Pedagogical Institute, and Chirchik State Pedagogical University to implement the 4+2 system (4 days of theoretical training and 2 days of practice). The study examines the advantages and challenges of the system, demonstrating the effectiveness of the specially developed mobile application “Hamkorta’lim” and the GeoEducationbot. These multimedia tools enhance interaction between students and teachers. However, challenges such as a lack of methodological guidelines, organizational shortcomings, and the absence of a clear regulatory framework were identified. Proposed solutions explore ways to improve the system’s effectiveness.
Keywords
4 2 system, Hamkorta’lim, GeoEducationbot
References
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
Smith, J., & Brown, T. (2020). Active learning and cognitive development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 456–467.
Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2021). Digital tools in education: Enhancing motivation and problem-solving skills. Frontiers in Education, 6, 123–134.
Presidential Resolution of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PP-289. (2022). On measures to improve the quality of pedagogical education. Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning and technology integration in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 897–915.
UNESCO. (2020). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action. Paris: UNESCO.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Moscow: Pedagogy.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mirziyoyev, Sh. M. (2021). Strategy for the Development of the Education System of the Republic of Uzbekistan Until 2030. Tashkent: Administration of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for technology integration in education. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 M.Sh. Tokhirova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.