The Effectiveness of The Total Physical Response Method in Teaching Young Learners: A Scientific Overview
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume05Issue05-33Keywords:
Total Physical Response, memory, Physical activityAbstract
This paper explores the theoretical underpinnings, empirical evidence, and educational implications of Total Physical Response (TPR) in early language instruction, highlighting its advantages, difficulties, and cognitive processes. The results indicate that TPR promotes enhanced retention, engagement, and language comprehension in young learners, offering significant potential for language educators. TPR was developed by Dr. James Asher in the 1960s and has garnered significant attention as an effective language acquisition tool for young learners. The method is based on the belief that language learning can be enhanced by combining physical movement with verbal input.
Downloads
References
Asher, J. (1969). The Total Physical Response Method for Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 53(3), 317.
Gharbavi, A., & Mousavi, S. A. (2012). The Effect of Total Physical Response on Motivation and Vocabulary Retention. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(5), 88-94.
Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Pergamon Press.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Language Anxiety: Its Relationship to Other Anxieties and Cognitive and Performance Measures. Language Learning, 41(3), 513-534.
Silveira, I., & Dantas, M. (2010). The Effectiveness of Total Physical Response Method in Language Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 907-913.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six Views of Embodied Cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Esbergenova Khurliman Makhsetovna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.