This study explores the integration of corpus linguistics tools in the training of pre-service English teachers, focusing on enhancing their linguistic competencies and pedagogical effectiveness. By employing tools such as LancsBox X, AntConc, and SKELL, the research examines how these resources can facilitate the development of professional communication skills in English within higher education contexts. The findings indicate that corpus-based approaches offer significant advantages in understanding language use, improving teaching methodologies, and addressing regional linguistic characteristics. The study proposes practical recommendations for incorporating corpus linguistics into teacher training programs to foster a more interactive and data-driven learning environment.  

Corpus linguistics, pre-service English teachers, linguistic competencies

Brezina, V., Weill-Tessier, P., & McEnery, A. (2020). #LancsBox v. 5.x. [software]. Available at: http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox.

Anthony, L. (2006). AntConc: A learner and classroom friendly, multi-platform corpus analysis toolkit. Proceedings of the 2006 JALT CALL Conference.

Baisa, V., & Suchomel, V. (2014). SkELL: Web Interface for English Language Learning. Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing.

Callies, M. (2019) Integrating corpus literacy into language teacher education. In S. Götz & J. Mukherjee (Eds.), Learner Corpora and Language Teaching (pp. 245–263). Amsterdam, Philadephia: John Benjamins.

Farr, F. (2008). Evaluating the Use of Corpus-based Instruction in a Language Teacher Education Context: Perspectives from the Users. Language Awareness, 17(1), 25–43.

Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67(S1), 155–179.

Heather, J., & Helt, M. (2012). Evaluating corpus literacy training for pre-service language teachers: Six case studies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(4), 415–440.