In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards involving students in the feedback process for their teachers. This approach recognizes that students are not just passive recipients of education, but active participants who can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of teaching methods. By soliciting feedback from students, teachers can gain a better understanding of what is working well in their classrooms, as well as areas that need improvement. This can lead to more effective teaching practices and better outcomes for students. In this article, we will explore the benefits and challenges of involving students in giving feedback to their teachers, and provide some stages for making the process a success.
STUDENTS' INVOLVEMENT IN GIVING FEEDBACK TO THEIR TEACHERS
DOI:
Keywords:
Education
feedback
teachers
Abstract
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Anderson, A. R., Christenson, S. L., Sinclair, M. F., & Lehr, C. A. (2004). Check & connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school. Journal of School Psychology, 42(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.01.002
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701292548.
Shute, V. J. (2008a). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2016). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37.