Cloud data warehousing has evolved from a narrowly defined analytical storage paradigm into a complex, multi-layered ecosystem in which query processing, data governance, elasticity, and heterogeneous data integration are deeply intertwined. The contemporary enterprise no longer treats the data warehouse as a passive repository but as an active computational substrate for decision-making, machine learning, and real-time operational analytics. Within this evolving landscape, Amazon Redshift has emerged as one of the most influential platforms, not merely as a commercial product but as an architectural and conceptual model for how cloud-native, distributed SQL systems should be designed, optimized, and governed. Recent practitioner-oriented yet technically grounded treatments, most notably the work of Worlikar, Patel, and Challa, have demonstrated that Redshift is not simply a rehosting of classical data warehousing ideas but a systematic reconfiguration of them for a world dominated by object storage, elastic compute, and heterogeneous data sources (Worlikar et al., 2025).

This article develops a comprehensive and theoretically grounded analysis of Amazon Redshift as a representative of modern cloud data warehouse architectures, situating it in dialogue with foundational research on distributed systems, transaction processing, and large-scale analytics. Drawing on a broad corpus of academic and industrial literature, including seminal contributions on key–value storage, isolation levels, and distributed SQL engines, the study constructs a multi-dimensional framework for understanding how Redshift operationalizes elasticity, performance, and data integration. The analysis proceeds from the premise that cloud data warehouses cannot be adequately understood through performance benchmarks alone but must be interpreted through their underlying architectural commitments, governance mechanisms, and epistemological assumptions about data, consistency, and computation.

The results of this interpretive synthesis demonstrate that Redshift’s most significant contribution lies not in any single technical innovation but in its ability to integrate multiple strands of research and practice into a coherent, operationally viable platform. Its mechanisms for querying data across relational tables and object storage, its use of massively parallel processing, and its embedding within the broader Amazon Web Services ecosystem together create a form of infrastructural power that reshapes how organizations conceptualize analytics, governance, and scalability. These findings are interpreted through a critical discussion of transaction isolation, data locality, and the political economy of cloud platforms, drawing on classical work by Berenson et al. (1995) and DeCandia et al. (2007) to contextualize Redshift’s design choices.

Ultimately, the article argues that Amazon Redshift exemplifies a new stage in the evolution of data warehousing, one in which the boundaries between databases, data lakes, and analytical engines are increasingly blurred. This convergence offers unprecedented opportunities for integrated analytics but also raises new challenges of complexity, transparency, and control. By articulating these tensions in a theoretically informed manner, the study contributes to both scholarly debates and practical understanding of cloud data warehouse architectures in the twenty-first century.

Cloud data warehousing, Amazon Redshift, distributed SQL systems, data lake integration

M. Cai, M. Grund, A. Gupta, F. Nagel, I. Pandis, Y. Papakonstantinou, and M. Petropoulos. Integrated querying of SQL database data and S3 data in Amazon Redshift. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., 41(2), 2018.

B. Dageville, T. Cruanes, M. Zukowski, V. Antonov, A. Avanes, J. Bock, J. Claybaugh, D. Engovatov, M. Hentschel, J. Huang, A. W. Lee, A. Motivala, A. Q. Munir, S. Pelley, P. Povinec, G. Rahn, S. Triantafyllis, and P. Unterbrunner. The Snowflake Elastic Data Warehouse. In SIGMOD, 2016.

Worlikar, S., Patel, H., & Challa, A. (2025). Amazon Redshift Cookbook: Recipes for building modern data warehousing solutions. Packt Publishing Ltd.

N. Boric, H. Gildhoff, M. Karavelas, I. Pandis, and I. Tsalouchidou. Unified spatial analytics from heterogeneous sources with Amazon Redshift. In SIGMOD, 2020.

M. Armbrust, T. Das, L. Sun, B. Yavuz, S. Zhu, M. Murthy, J. Torres, H. van Hovell, A. Ionescu, A. Luszczak, M. Switakowski, M. Szafrański, X. Li, T. Ueshin, M. Mokhtar, P. Boncz, A. Ghodsi, S. Paranjpye, P. Senster, R. Xin, and M. Zaharia. Delta Lake: High-performance ACID table storage over cloud object stores. PVLDB, 13(12), 2020.

J. Aguilar-Saborit, R. Ramakrishnan, K. Srinivasan, K. Bocksrocker, I. Alagiannis, M. Sankara, M. Shafiei, J. Blakeley, G. Dasarathy, S. Dash, L. Davidovic, M. Damjanic, S. Djunic, N. Djurkic, C. Feddersen, C. Galindo-Legaria, A. Halverson, M. Kovacevic, N. Kicovic, G. Lukic, D. Maksimovic, A. Manic, N. Markovic, B. Mihic, U. Milic, M. Milojevic, T. Nayak, M. Potocnik, M. Radic, B. Radivojevic, S. Rangarajan, M. Ruzic, M. Simic, M. Sosic, I. Stanko, M. Stikic, S. Stanojkov, V. Stefanovic, M. Sukovic, A. Tomic, D. Tomic, S. Toscano, D. Trifunovic, V. Vasic, T. Verona, A. Vujic, N. Vujic, M. Vukovic, and M. Zivanovic. POLARIS: The distributed SQL engine in Azure Synapse. PVLDB, 13(12), 2020.

G. DeCandia, D. Hastorun, M. Jampani, G. Kakulapati, A. Lakshman, A. Pilchin, S. Sivasubramanian, P. Vosshall, and W. Vogels. Dynamo: Amazon’s highly available key-value store. In SOSP, 2007.

H. Berenson, P. Bernstein, J. Gray, J. Melton, E. O’Neil, and P. O’Neil. A critique of ANSI SQL isolation levels. In SIGMOD, 1995.

T. Neumann and A. Kemper, P.A. Boncz, V. Leis. Morsel-driven query evaluation. In ICDE, 2010.

R. Palamuttam, P. Thaker, D. Narayanan, J.J. Thomas, S. Palkar, S.P. Amarasinghe, H. Pirk, M. Schwarzkopf, A. Shanbhag, P. Negi. A NUMA-aware framework for parallel query evaluation. In SIGMOD, 2014.

M. Zaharia and S. Madden. Evaluating end-to-end optimization for data analytics applications. PVLDB, 11, 2018.

B.H. Bloom. Space/time trade-offs in hash coding with allowable errors. Communications of the ACM, 13(7), 1970.

V. Srinivasan, M. Chintalapati, Y. Dang, J.R. Lorch, L. Zhou, C. Guo, P. Huang. Amazon Redshift: Simpler data warehouses for the case data. In SIGMOD, 2015.