Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijmef/Volume05Issue12-09
Effective Use Of The Banking System In Utilizing Investment Resources
Abstract
Banks are still the main institutional way that economies get their savings together and turn them into money for long-term investments. The scale of credit alone does not define effective use of investment resources. It also includes the quality of allocation, maturity transformation, pricing of risk, and resilience to shocks. The study conceptualizes “effective utilization” as a composite outcome that integrates allocative efficiency, stable funding capacity, and the capability to maintain credit for viable investments throughout the economic cycle, employing a structured synthesis of finance-growth research and significant policy reports. The results show that stable deposit-based funding and a reliable banking system support longer-term financing; that cash-flow underwriting and information systems make credit more productive; that project-finance structuring and risk-sharing make more infrastructure investments possible; and that digitalization can increase the marginal productivity of investment resources by lowering screening and servicing costs while adding new operational and model risks. The conversation shows that banks' ability to finance investments without making systemic vulnerabilities worse is affected by a number of factors, including prudential resilience, governance quality, and the growing interconnectedness with nonbank finance. The article says that to make investments work, you need a plan that includes strong supervision and incentives, good governance, accurate credit information, and technology-enabled intermediation that works with risk management.
Keywords
Banking intermediation, investment resources, credit allocation
References
Levine R. Finance and Growth: Theory and Evidence // Handbook of Economic Growth / ed. by P. Aghion, S. Durlauf. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005. Vol. 1A. P. 865–934.
Rajan R. G., Zingales L. Financial Dependence and Growth // American Economic Review. 1998. Vol. 88, No. 3. P. 559–586.
World Bank. Global Financial Development Report 2019/2020: Bank Regulation and Supervision a Decade after the Global Financial Crisis. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2019. 222 p. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1447-1.
Bank for International Settlements. BIS Annual Economic Report 2024. Basel: BIS, 2024.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III: Finalising Post-crisis Reforms. Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2017.
International Monetary Fund. Global Financial Stability Report: Shifting Ground Beneath the Calm. Washington, DC: IMF, 2025.
Financial Stability Board. Global Monitoring Report on Nonbank Financial Intermediation 2025. Basel: FSB, 2025.
Financial Stability Board. Global Monitoring Report on Non-Bank Financial Intermediation 2024. Basel: FSB, 2024.
Beck T., Levine R., Loayza N. Finance and the Sources of Growth // Journal of Financial Economics. 2000. Vol. 58, No. 1–2. P. 261–300.
Demirgüç-Kunt A., Levine R. (eds.). Financial Structure and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Comparison of Banks, Markets, and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.
Stiglitz J. E., Weiss A. Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information // American Economic Review. 1981. Vol. 71, No. 3. P. 393–410.
Diamond D. W. Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring // Review of Economic Studies. 1984. Vol. 51, No. 3. P. 393–414.
La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. W. Legal Determinants of External Finance // Journal of Finance. 1997. Vol. 52, No. 3. P. 1131–1150.
Allen F., Gale D. Comparing Financial Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
Boot A. W. A. Relationship Banking: What Do We Know? // Journal of Financial Intermediation. 2000. Vol. 9, No. 1. P. 7–25.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Isayeva Nargiza Xamidovna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.