Articles | Open Access |

Democratic Backsliding, Populist Mobilization, And the Fragility of Liberal Institutions: A Theoretical Study of Contemporary Challenges to Democratic Quality and Resilience

Dr. Adrian Keller , Department of Political Theory and Comparative Governance, University of Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between populism, democratic backsliding, autocratization, polarization, and institutional resilience through a theoretically integrated analysis of the references provided. Drawing strictly on classic and contemporary scholarship on democracy, democratic transition, illiberalism, populism, and democratic decline, the study argues that contemporary threats to democracy cannot be understood as isolated electoral anomalies or temporary crises of representation. Rather, they must be interpreted as manifestations of deeper tensions within democratic development itself, including unresolved conflicts between majority rule and liberal restraint, widening gaps between popular sovereignty and institutional mediation, increasing polarization, and the strategic exploitation of democratic legitimacy by anti-pluralist political actors (Dahl, 1991; Diamond, 2015; Levitsky & Ziblatt, 2018; Mudde, 2022). The article shows that democratic erosion frequently unfolds from within rather than through overt coups, with elected leaders weakening norms, undermining accountability, capturing institutions, and delegitimizing opposition while retaining the language of democratic authorization (Boese & Lührmann, 2020; Levitsky & Way, 2010; Pappas, 2021). It further argues that cultural backlash, identity conflict, and the restructuring of public discourse under digital and data-driven conditions intensify this process by increasing susceptibility to populist narratives and institutional distrust (Inglehart & Norris, 2017; Mounk, 2023; Tufekci, 2014). Methodologically, the article employs an interpretive qualitative synthesis of the supplied literature. The findings suggest that democracy is endangered not only by authoritarian ambition but also by democratic fatigue, civic polarization, weak intermediating institutions, and the normalization of illiberal practices. At the same time, the study identifies sources of democratic resilience in institutional design, norm maintenance, pluralist culture, and political self-restraint (Levitsky & Way, 2022; Linz & Stepan, 1996). The article concludes that defending democracy today requires more than electoral continuity; it requires renewing liberal-democratic commitments, rebuilding trust, reducing polarization, and strengthening the cultural and institutional foundations of democratic consolidation.

Keywords

Democracy, populism, democratic backsliding

References

Boese, V. A., & Lührmann, A. (2020). Populism and autocratization: Impacts on democratic quality. Government and Opposition, 55(2), 285–307.

Dahl, R. A. (1991). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Diamond, L. (1990). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 141–155.

Diamond, L. (2024). Ill winds still blow: Democracy’s struggle against populism. Journal of Democracy, 35(1), 22–38.

Economist Intelligence Unit. (2020). Democracy index 2020: In sickness and in health? London: Economist Intelligence Unit.

Economist Intelligence Unit. (2022). Democracy index 2022: Checkpoints of democracy. London: Economist Intelligence Unit.

Freedom House. (2020). Freedom in the world 2020: A leaderless struggle for democracy. Washington, DC: Freedom House.

Freedom House. (2022). Freedom in the world 2022: The global expansion of authoritarian rule. Washington, DC: Freedom House.

Global Populism Database. (2021). Global populism tracker 2021. London: Tony Blair Institute for Global Change.

Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2017). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2015). The myth of democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 45–58.

Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2022). Reversing democratic decline: Institutions, norms, and resilience. Comparative Political Studies, 55(4), 483–507.

Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. New York: Crown Publishing.

Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. New York: Doubleday.

McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2021). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 235–260.

Merkel, W. (2014). Is there a crisis of democracy? Democratic Theory, 1(2), 11–25.

Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. London: John W. Parker & Son.

Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mounk, Y. (2023). The identity trap: A story of ideas and power in our time. New York: Penguin Random House.

Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mudde, C. (2016). Europe’s populist surge: A long time in the making. Foreign Affairs, 95(6), 25–30.

Mudde, C. (2022). Populism in power: Democracy dismantled from within. European Political Science Review, 14(2), 101–116.

Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2023). Cultural backlash revisited: Populist authoritarianism in post-industrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Pappas, T. (2014). Populism and crisis politics in Greece. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pappas, T. (2021). Populists in power: Institutional deconsolidation in comparative perspective. Journal of Political Ideologies, 26(3), 215–233.

Tocqueville, A. de. (1840). Democracy in America (Vol. II). New York: G. Dearborn & Co.

Tufekci, Z. (2014). Engineering the public: Big data, surveillance and computational politics. First Monday, 19(7).

V-Dem Institute. (2023). Democracy report 2023: Defiance in the face of autocratization. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

Zakaria, F. (2003). The future of freedom: Illiberal democracy at home and abroad. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Dr. Adrian Keller. (2026). Democratic Backsliding, Populist Mobilization, And the Fragility of Liberal Institutions: A Theoretical Study of Contemporary Challenges to Democratic Quality and Resilience. International Journal Of History And Political Sciences, 6(04), 1–12. Retrieved from https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijhps/article/view/9737