
Strategic Leverage and Regional Balancing: Türkiye’s Role in Trump’s Middle East Agenda and The Shifting Architecture of Regional Power
Abstract
This paper explores the shifting role of Türkiye in the Middle East during Donald Trump, outlining how Ankara utilized an evolving regional and global context to rebrand itself as a regional power. Trump’s foreign policy was a radical break from liberal internationalism and embraced instead the neorealist policies of selective engagement, strategic recusal, and transactional diplomacy. Here, the recharted geography, Türkiye navigated the fine line between NATO alliance obligations and burgeoning relationships with Russia, China, and regional actors, asserting its national sovereignty and strategic involvement. Analyzing Türkiye’s balancing acts in key theatres — from post-Assad Syria and nuclear diplomacy with Iran to defense-industrial cooperation in the Gulf — through the prisms of neorealist and neoclassical realist lenses, this paper argues that. It argues that Trump’s strategic strategy inadvertently encouraged middle powers like Türkiye to push their leverage to the fullest extent while meeting Washington’s burden sharing expectations.
Keywords
Trump Doctrine, Middle Powers, Neorealism
References
Çandar, C. (2025). Iran’s domestic unrest and regional spillover risks: A Turkish perspective. Institute for Strategic Thinking.
Cook, S. A. (2017). False dawn: Protest, democracy, and violence in the new Middle East. Oxford University Press.
Duran, B. (2014). Understanding Turkey’s foreign policy in the Middle East during the AK Party era. Insight Turkey, 16(2), 91–105.
Efron, S., Hansell, L., & McNerney, M. J. (2021). The Abraham Accords and the changing face of the Middle East. RAND Corporation.
Erdoğan, R. T. (2025). Strategic autonomy and Middle East diplomacy: Reflections from Türkiye. Office of the Presidency.
International Crisis Group. (2021). Turkey’s PKK conflict: A visual explainer. https://www.crisisgroup.org
Karacasulu, N. A. (2016). Security and energy in the Turkish–Iranian relations. Middle East Policy, 23(3), 60–75.
Katzman, K. (2024). Iran’s foreign and defense policies (CRS Report No. R44017). Congressional Research Service.
Kupchan, C. A. (2023). Isolationism reconsidered: America’s withdrawal and middle power realignment. Foreign Affairs, 102(2), 44–52.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye. (2025). Summary of President Erdoğan’s diplomatic engagements at the NATO Summit in The Hague. https://tccb.gov.tr
Quincy Institute. (2025). Balancing without dominance: Rethinking U.S. alliances in the Middle East. Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft.
Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172.
SIPRI. (2024). Trends in international arms transfers 2024. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://sipri.org
Stein, A. (2025). Türkiye’s cautious approach to Trump’s Iran policy. Middle East Policy, 32(1), 65–80.
Trump, D. J. (2020). America First: Foreign policy speeches 2016–2020. White House Archive.
U.S. Department of State. (2020). Abraham Accords declarations. https://www.state.gov/abraham-accords/
Walt, S. M. (1985). Alliance formation and the balance of world power. International Security, 9(4), 3–43.
Walt, S. M. (2024). The end of American unipolarity and the rise of strategic vacuums. International Security, 48(1), 7–33.
Waltz, K. N. (2010). Theory of international politics. Waveland Press.
World Bank. (2025). Middle East and North Africa economic update: Seizing the opportunity for a new social contract. https://worldbank.org
Yetkin, M. (2025). Operation Rising Lion and its implications for Turkish foreign policy. YetkinReport. https://yetkinreport.com
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mashrabov Doston Dilmurodjon ugli

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.