Abdication of British Dominance in China: Political and Ideological Inviolability of Hong-Kong In the Status of Autonomy
Abstract
This article explores the reasons and foundations for the formation of Hong Kong’s autonomy, one of the unique state systems in existence today, and its transition from 155 years of British colonial rule to Communist China. It also analyzes the guarantees given in the Sino-British Joint Declaration signed between the United Kingdom and China in 1984, the rights of Hong Kong’s autonomy and the terms of the agreement reached regarding the powers of the People’s Republic of China. China-Hong Kong relations based on the principle of “one country, two systems” can be seen to be severely salted by today’s communist Beijing’s policy of absolute centralization of power in governance. In turn, this current conflict creates new challenges for Hong Kong in maintaining its legal, economic and socio-political identity. By examining recent actions and several researches on the issue of Hong-Kong’s sovereignty, this article sheds light on the importance of Hong-Kong’s political annexation by China in implementing geopolitical ambitions of the Central Communist Party. This paper argues that the gradual erosion of Hong Kong’s autonomy signifies a breach of the 1984 agreement’s core commitments, with far-reaching consequences for China’s international relations and the viability of regional autonomy within its borders.
Keywords
“One China” policy, Hong Kong SAR (Special Administrative Region), communismHow to Cite
References
Adorjan, M., Khiatani, P. V., & Chui, W. H. (2021). The rise and ongoing legacy of localism as collective identity in Hong Kong: Resinicisation anxieties and punishment of political dissent in the post-colonial era. Punishment & Society, 23(5), 650-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211040308
Chan, M. K. (1997). The Legacy of the British Administration of Hong Kong: A View from Hong Kong. The China Quarterly, 151, 567–582. doi:10.1017/S0305741000046828
Ghai, Y. (2013). Hong Kong’s autonomy: Dialects of powers and institutions. In Y. Ghai & S. Woodman (Eds.), Practising Self-Government: A Comparative Study of Autonomous Regions (pp. 315–348). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ghai, Y. (1991). The Past and the Future of Hong Kong’s Constitution. The China Quarterly, 128, 794–813. http://www.jstor.org/stable/654371
Iverson Ng, (2024). Hidden Chinese Systemic Rivalry: Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices in the EU (Prague, Czech Republic: Association for International Affairs (AMO), 2024).
Maxwell, N. (1995). Sino-British Confrontation over Hong Kong. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(23), 1384–1398. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4402855
Ming, D. (1991). The Principles and Flexibility in China’s External Relations: The Case of Hong-Kong. ProQuest LLC. (2014)
Mushkat, R. (1986). The Transition from British to Chinese Rule in Hong Kong: A Discussion of Salient International Legal Issues. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 14(2), 171–206.
Wang, C. (2024). Hong Kong in the age of the PRC’s alienation from the international system: In search of normative consensus. Global Constitutionalism, 13(1), 53–78. doi:10.1017/S2045381723000035
Whitlock, Abby S. (2019) “Setting the Sun on the British Empire: British Economic Interests and the Decolonization of Hong Kong,” James Blair Historical Review: Vol.9: Iss.2, Article 3.
Xiaohui, E. (2001). Reconceptualizing “One Country, Two Systems” in the Quest for Autonomy and Human Rights in Hong Kong under Chinese Sovereignty. National Library of Canada. (2001)
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kholmurodov Otabek Alimardonovich, Madaminov Abduvosidjon Abdurashid o‘g‘li
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.