Tibet and the Mongols: a sacred historical union
Abstract
The relationship between the Sacred Federation of Tibet and the Mongol Empire is a compelling chapter in the history of Asia. This article explores the intricate geopolitical and diplomatic interactions between Tibet, under the influence of its spiritual leadership, and the Mongol Empire, which sought to expand its territorial control. This paper examines the political, cultural, and religious dynamics between these two entities, focusing on the period of Mongol dominance in the 13th and 14th centuries. Through an analysis of historical documents and secondary sources, the study outlines the factors that shaped their relationship, including the influence of religion, the role of Tibetan Buddhism, and the Mongol’s political strategies. It also delves into the broader geopolitical implications of their cooperation and the lasting impacts of this period on the region.
Keywords
Sacred Federation of Tibet, Mongol Empire, geopolitical relationsHow to Cite
References
Allsen, Thomas T. 1983. The Yüan dynasty and the Uighurs of Turfan in the 13th century. In China Among Equals: The Middle Kingdom and Its Neighbors, 10th–14th Centuries, 1st ed. Edited by Morris Rossabi. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 243–80. [Google Scholar]
Apple, James B. 2014. Buddhism in Tibetan history. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to East and Inner Asian Buddhism, 1st ed. Edited by Mario Poceski. Chichester and Malden: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 104–23. [Google Scholar]
Atwood, Christopher P. 2014. The first Mongol contacts with the Tibetans. In Trails of the Tibetan Tradition: Papers for Elliot Sperling, 1st ed. Edited by Roberto Vitali. Dharamshala: Amnye Machen Institute, pp. 21–45. [Google Scholar]
Atwood, Christopher P. 2016. Buddhists as natives changing positions in the religious ecology of the Mongol Yuan dynasty. In The Middle Kingdom and the Dharma Wheel: Aspects of the Relationship between the Buddhist Saṃgha and the State in Chinese History, 1st ed. Edited by Thomas Jülch. Leiden: Brill, vol. 133, pp. 278–321. [Google Scholar]
Bakisian, Nina. 1992. An unrealized reality: Some views on Danubian Federation. Balkan Studies 33: 99–110. [Google Scholar]
Barkey, Karen, and George Gavrilis. 2018. The Ottoman Millet system: Non-Territorial autonomy and its contemporary legacy. In Non-Territorial Autonomy in Divided Societies, 1st ed. Edited by John Coakley. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 24–42. [Google Scholar]
Bauer, Otto. 2015. The concept of nation. In Austro-Marxism: The Ideology of Unity, 1st ed. Edited by Mark E. Blum and William Smaldone. Leiden: Brill, pp. 258–81. [Google Scholar]
Baumann, Brian. 2022. Buddhism in the Mongol Empire. In The Mongol World, 1st ed. Edited by Timothy May and Michael Hope. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 681–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biran, Michal. 2013. The Mongol Empire in world history: The state of the field. History Compass 11: 1021–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Birnbaum, Raoul. 1983. Studies on the Mysteries of Manjusri: A Group of East Asian Mandalas and Their Traditional Symbolism, 1st ed. Boulder: Society for the Study of Chinese Religions. [Google Scholar]
Blum, Mark E., and William Smaldone, eds. 2015. Karl Renner. In Austro-Marxism: The Ideology of Unity, 1st ed. Leiden: Brill, pp. 56–65. [Google Scholar]
Bowring, Bill. 2005. Burial and resurrection: Karl Renner’s controversial influence on the ‘national Question’ in Russia. In National-Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics, 1st ed. Edited by Ephraim Nimni. London: Routledge, pp. 162–75. [Google Scholar]
Breen, Michael G. 2020. Federalism, constitutional recognition and indigenous peoples: How a new identity-based state can be established in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science 55: 311–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Buell, Paul D. 2011. Tibetans, Mongols and the fusion of Eurasian cultures. In Islam and Tibet: Interactions Along the Musk Routes, 1st ed. Edited by Anna Akasoy, Charles Burnett and Ronit Yoeli-Tlalim. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 189–208. [Google Scholar]
Buell, Paul D., and Judith Kolbas. 2016. The ethos of state and society in the early Mongol Empire: Chinggis Khan to Güyük. Journal of The Royal Asiatic Society 26: 43–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Burgess, Michael. 2012. Multinational federalism in multinational federation. In Multinational Federalism, 1st ed. Edited by Michel Seymour and Alain-G. Gagnon. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 23–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Choi, Soyoung. 2022. From Brutes to Bodhisattvas: The Mongols in Tibetan sources. In The Mongol World, 1st ed. Edited by Timothy Michael May and Michael Hope. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 799–813. [Google Scholar]
Crocenzi, Mauro. 2019. The historical development of Tibetan ‘minzu’ identity through Chinese eyes: A preliminary analysis. Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines 51: 99–118. [Google Scholar]
Cyr, Hugo. 2014. Autonomy, subsidiarity, solidarity: Foundations of cooperative federalism. Constitutional Forum/Forum Constitutionnel 23: 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
De Villiers, Bertus. 2016. Community government for minority groups–revisiting the ideas of Bauer and Renner towards developing a model of self-government by minority groups under public law. Zeitschrift Für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht Und Völkerrecht 76: 909–49. [Google Scholar]
Elazar, Daniel J. 1985. Federalism and consociational regimes. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 15: 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Elazar, Daniel J. 1987. Exploring Federalism, 1st ed. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. [Google Scholar]
Elazar, Daniel J. 1997. Contrasting unitary and federal systems. International Political Science Review 18: 237–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fan, Baoliang. 1992. Mengzang Guanxishi Yanjiu [Research on the History of Mongolian-Tibetan Relations], 1st ed. Qinghai: Qinghai People’s Publishing House. [Google Scholar]
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adam Boyden
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.