COMPLAINING ABOUT PROCEDURAL ACTIONS AND DECISIONS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
Abstract
This article talks about the normative basis of the rights of citizens in relation to appeals, the complaints that the parties may make about procedural actions and decisions in court proceedings, including criminal proceedings, and its legal basis. Also, the opinions and views of experts in the field regarding the right of interested parties to appeal against procedural actions and decisions in various court instances and the interpretation of this right are analyzed.
Keywords
Procedural action, complaint, state bodyHow to Cite
References
Constitution Of the Republic of Uzbekistan. [Text] official release. - Tashkent: Uzbekistan publishing house, 2023. – P.18, 23.
Review of the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Editor in charge: prof. A.A.Azizkhdjaev. - T.: Uzbekistan publishing house, 2008. – P. 413.
Reviews of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Editor in charge: prof. G.A. Abdumajidov. - T.: TSUL publishing, 2009. – P. 5.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the national system for the protection of human rights in Uzbekistan: ed. by A.H.Saidov T., 2009. – P.136.
Shavkat Mirziyoev's lecture at the solemn ceremony dedicated to the 27th anniversary of the adoption of the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan / http://uza.uz/oz/politics/konstitutsiya-va-onun-ustuvorligi-u-u- iy-demokratik-davlat-v-07-12-2019
Smirnov A.A. Preface//Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. St. Petersburg, 2003, – P. 22.
Mamadiev S.N. Appeal to the court over the decisions and actions of the interrogator, investigator, prosecutor. Candidate of legal sciences diss. - T.: Tashkent State Institute of Law, 2010. - P 31, 64, 71.
Kamynin I. Responsibility for violations in the field of criminal procedure // Legality. – 2006. – No. 1. – P. 6.
Criminal proceedings: educational guide/developer authors Mirazov D.M., Khojanazarov I.E., Berdiyarov Sh.N. - T.: Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2013. - P.12.
Lupinskaya P.A. Decisions in criminal proceedings: theory, legislation, practice. 2nd ed. reprint. and dop M., 2010.
Tsokolova O.I. Problems of improving the grounds for applying a preventive measure in the form of detention // Russian investigator. – 2005. – No. 5. – p. 10.
Pradel J. Procédure pénal. Paris, 1997. 525 p.
Lazareva V.S. Judicial protection in the criminal process of the Russian Federation: problems of theory and practice: Abstract... doct. Jurid. Sciences. – M., 2000. – pp. 9-10.
Babenko A., Yablokov V. Judicial control over the preliminary investigation must be expanded // Russian Justice. 2000. № 6. – pp. 3-4. Piyuk A. Prospects of judicial control // The Russian justice system. 2000. No. 4. – p. 31.
Khaliulin A. From prosecutorial supervision to judicial control / A.Khaliulin, V.Nazarenko//Legality. 2004 No. 1. – p. 25., Baranov A.M. Judicial control over pre-trial proceedings //Pre-trial proceedings: (Current issues of theory and practice): materials of scientific and practical conference – Omsk, 2002. –p. 29.
Sviridov M.K. Judicial power, its manifestation in criminal proceedings // Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Right. 2018. No. 27. – p. 92.
Kolokolov N.A. Judicial control at the stage of preliminary investigation: reality and prospects//States and rights. 1998 No. 11. – p.31.
Resolution of the Supreme Council of the RSFSR on the Concept of judicial reform in the RSFSR http://pravo.gov.ru.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Djuraev Ikhtiyor Bakhtiyorovich
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.