This article discusses the pursuing diplomatic efforts of USA. The optimal approach for the United States to address the Taiwan issue and maintain regional stability would be to adopt a strategic clarity policy. Alternative policy options such as strategic ambiguity and strategic reassurance have significant drawbacks and risks. Strategic ambiguity can increase the likelihood of misinterpretation and hostility. Strategic reassurance may be viewed as provocative by China, potentially damaging US-China relations.

Diplomatic efforts, optimal approach, United States

Dadabaev, T. (2006). Japan’s Central Asian Diplomacy and Its Implications. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Analyst, 9.

Gleason, G. (2006). The Uzbek Expulsion US Forces and in Central Asia. Problems of Post-Communism, 53(2), 49-60.

Blank, S. (2006). America strikes back? Geopolitical rivalry in Central Asia and the Caucasus. CACI Analyst, 17.

Christensen, T. J. (2006). Fostering stability or creating a monster? The rise of China and US policy toward East Asia. International security, 31(1), 81-126.

Larson, D. W., & Shevchenko, A. (2010). Status seekers: Chinese and Russian responses to US primacy. International security, 34(4), 63-95.

Sayfullaev, D. B. (2020). Conceptual Basis of the Modern West and East Diplomacy Study. J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Isses, 23, 1.

Sayfullaev, D. (2016). Parliamentary Diplomacy In Making Of Foreign Policy. The Advance Science Journal of International Relations, 1(1), 52-54.