Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home

American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2141
Published Article

Problematic teaching style in the development of argumentation and logical thinking in students

Problematic teaching style in the development of argumentation and logical thinking in students

  • Urdashev Azamat Baxtiyarovich
    Teacher of the Department of Social Sciences of the Uzbekistan State University of World Languages, Uzbekistan
Argumentation problem teaching method

In the process of modern education, it is important to develop students ' abilities for independent thinking, logical thinking and argumentation. In achieving these goals, the problematic teaching style is recognized as an effective tool. This article analyzes the theoretical foundations of the problematic teaching method, its role in the formation of argumentation and logical thinking in students, as well as its practical application.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

R.Ishmuhamedov, M.Yuldashev, Innovative pedagogical technologies in education and upbringing. Tutorial. – T.: 2013. 279-p

M.M. Xolmirzayev, "Application of problematic educational technologies in teaching chemistry", Science and Education, vol. 5, no. 12, 2024, pp. 246-257.

M.T. Jumaniyozova. Text of the lecture on the subject “Advanced pedagogical technologies and their application in practice”, Tashkent-2010.

Lazarou, D, Erduran, S & Sutherland, R 2017, ‘Argumentation in science education as an evolving concept: Following the object of activity’, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, vol. 14, February 2018, pp. 51-66.

Means, ML & Voss, JF 1996, ‘Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels’, Cognition and Instruction, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 139-178.

Rayner, GM & Papakonstantinou, T 2018, 'Foundation biology students’ critical thinking ability: Self-efficacy versus actuality', Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1-14.

Osborne, J, Erduran, S, Simon, S & Monk, M 2001, ‘Enhancing the quality of argument in school science’, School Science Review, vol. 82, no. June, pp. 63-70.

https://devos.uz/oquv-jarayonida-muammoli-oqitishning-ahamiyati-2/