Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue11-20
Global And Uzbek Perspectives On Intertextuality: An Analytical Comparison
Abstract
This article provides a comparative analysis of intertextuality in Western and Uzbek linguistics. It traces the evolution of intertextual theory from Bakhtin’s dialogism and Kristeva’s semiotic approach to the postmodern interpretations of Barthes, Genette, and Eco. The study highlights how Uzbek linguists such as Yo‘ldoshev, Khomidova, and Muzaffarova have localized and reinterpreted intertextuality within national literary and cultural contexts. Methodologically, the research employs comparative-descriptive and analytical approaches, focusing on the adaptation of global theories to Uzbek linguistic traditions.
Keywords
Intertextuality, dialogism, comparative linguistics, Uzbek linguistics
References
Кристева Ю. Бахтин, слово, диалог и роман. Французская семиотика: От структурализма к постструктурализму. – М., 2000. – С. 427-457. http://www.philology.ru/literature/1/kristеva-00.htm.
Бахтин М. Проблема текста в лингвистике , филологи и и други х гуманитарных науках . Опыт философского анализа // Эстетика словесного творчества . М., 1979 – 106 c.
Allen G. Intertextuality. Routledge, 2000. – p 62.
Riffaterre M. Semiotics of Poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978.
Barthes R. S/Z. – Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974. – P. 5–18.
Genette G. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. – Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1997. – P. 14–39.
Bloom H. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. – New York: Oxford University Press, 1973. – P. 54–73.
Eco U. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. – Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979. – P. 102–118.
Eco U. Lector in Fabula. – Milano: Bompiani, 1979. – P. 35–61.
Hutcheon L. A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. – New York: Methuen, 1985. – P. 65–78.
Ҳомидова М. Бадиий матн персепциясида интертекстуаллик: Филол. фан. бўйича фалс. док. … дис. – Тошкент, 2021. – 15 б.
Йўлдошев М. Бадиий матннинг лингвопоэтик тадқиқи: Филол. фан. д-ри... дисс. – Тошкент, 2009. – 127 б.
Музаффарова Л. Билим тузилмаларининг бадиий интертекстуаллик кўламида концептуаллашуви (Ж.Д. Сэлинжер асарлари мисолида): Филол.фан.б.фалс.док. …дисс.автореф. – Тошкент, 2022. – Б. 15-17.
Худойберганова Д. Ўзбек тилидаги бадиий матнларнинг антропоцентрик тадқиқи: Филол. фан. доктори … дис. – Тошкент, 2015. – Б. 129–160.Xudoyberganova D. O’zbek tilidagi badiiy matnlarning antroposentrik tadqiqi: Filol.fan.d-ri…diss. – Toshkent, 2015. – B. 129-160.
Файзуллаева Х. Интертекстуальность и её функции в литературе. // Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, Educational, Natural and Social Sciences. 2024, т. 4, № 11. – Б. 441–445.
Abdullayeva M. Intertekstuallikning tilshunoslikda o‘rganilishi. // Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi. 2024, № 19_1. – B. 58–61. – URL: http://web-journal.ru/
Khajieva F. Cultural-aesthetic function of intertextual devices in The Moor’s Account by Layla Lalami. // Theoretical & Applied Science. 2021, № 11(103). – B. 1111–1115. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS
Khajieva F. Cosmopolitanism through intertextual devices in the postmodern biographical novel. // ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 2021, t. 11, № 11. – B. 156–161. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7137.2021.02428.9
Haydarova N. Functions of intertextuality in discourse analysis. // Spanish Journal of Innovation and Integrity. 2022, № 6. – B. 142–146. – URL: http://sjii.indexedresearch.org
Haydarova N. Interdiscursivity and intertextuality: Relation of concepts. // Eurasian Research Bulletin. 2022, № 7. – B. 180–183. – URL: https://geniusjournals.org/index.php/erb/article/view/1295
Qo‘chqorova S. Badiiy matnlarda intertekstuallik kategoriyasining namoyon bo‘lishiga oid. // Zamonaviy filologiya va lingvodidaktikaning dolzarb masalalari: Xalqaro ilmiy-amaliy konferensiya materiallari. 2024, 23–24 aprel. – B. 1044–1047. – Chirchiq davlat pedagogika universiteti. – URL: https://cspu.uz/
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. Expanded web version, December 15, 2003. http://www.wam.umd.edu/~mtum/WWW/blending.html
O‘rinova Z. Badiiy matnni tushunishda intertekstual birliklarning o‘rni. // Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, Educational, Natural and Social Sciences. 2023, t. 3, № 1. – B. 98–102. – URL: https://www.oriens.uz
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yuldasheva Maftunaxon Azizjon qizi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.