Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue10-10

LINGUISTIC AND LINGUOPRAGMATIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CATEGORY "RESPECT" IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

Ataniyazova Sohiba Ataboyevna , Teacher of Profi University, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article investigates the linguistic and linguopragmatic characteristics of the concept of "respect" in English and Uzbek, focusing on how cultural norms shape the expression of respect in these languages. Through a comparative analysis, the study examines the lexical, syntactic, and pragmalinguistic strategies used to convey respect, revealing key differences and similarities. In English, respect is often associated with individualism and conveyed through politeness strategies that protect personal autonomy and face. In contrast, Uzbek reflects a collectivist society where respect is more hierarchical, embedded in formal language structures such as honorifics and polite pronouns. This research underscores the importance of understanding cultural differences in linguistic expressions of respect, particularly in cross-cultural communication.

Keywords

Respect, politeness theory, linguopragmatics

References

Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different? *Journal of Pragmatics*, 11(2), 131-146.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). *Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage*. Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, J. (2011). *Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence*. Cambridge University Press.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), *Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts* (pp. 41-58). Academic Press.

Hasanov, R. (2009). Linguistic and Cultural Dimensions of Address Forms in Uzbek. *Journal of Uzbek Linguistics*, 12, 45-60.

Khodjieva, N. (2017). Politeness and Respect in the Uzbek Language: Pragmatic Analysis. *Central Asian Journal of Linguistics*, 15(2), 121-134.

Kecskes, I. (2014). *Intercultural Pragmatics*. Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, R. (1973). The Logic of Politeness; or, Minding Your P’s and Q’s. *Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society*, 9, 292-305.

Leech, G. N. (1983). *Principles of Pragmatics*. Longman.

Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect Speech Acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), *Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts* (pp. 59-82). Academic Press.

Terkourafi, M. (2015). *Pragmatics of Politeness*. Oxford University Press.

Watts, R. J. (2003). *Politeness*. Cambridge University Press.

Yuldashev, O. (2018). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics of Respect: A Comparative Study of English and Uzbek. *Journal of Language and Culture Studies*, 6(4), 187-204.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Ataniyazova Sohiba Ataboyevna. (2024). LINGUISTIC AND LINGUOPRAGMATIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CATEGORY "RESPECT" IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 4(10), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue10-10