The advent of digital technology has transformed communication, giving rise to new linguistic patterns across various languages. This article explores the linguistic aspects of electronic communication, focusing on English, Uzbek, and Russian languages. Through a comparative analysis, this study examines how language structures, slang, abbreviations, and cultural influences manifest in digital communication within these languages. The findings highlight the interplay between language and technology, revealing both commonalities and unique characteristics in how these languages adapt to electronic communication.

Electronic Communication, Linguistics, English Language

Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.

Herring, S. C. (2007). A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-Mediated Discourse. Language@Internet.

Danet, B., & Herring, S. C. (Eds.). (2007). The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online. Oxford University Press.

Pavlenko, A. (2008). Multilingualism in Post-Soviet Countries: Language Revival, Survival, and Shift. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(3-4), 275-314.

Akbarov, A. A., & Ismailova, F. (2012). Linguistic Identity and the Influence of English on Uzbek Language. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4734-4738.

Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge University Press.

Androutsopoulos, J. (2011). Language Change and Digital Media: A Review of Conceptions and Evidence. In T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe (pp. 145-161). Novus Press.

Russian Academy of Sciences. (2017). The Russian Language in the Digital Era. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 3(9), 12-25.

Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic Ruin? LOL! Instant Messaging and Teen Language. American Speech, 83(1), 3-34.

Karimova, D. A., & Tursunova, G. U. (2020). Digital Communication in Uzbekistan: Language, Culture, and New Media. Journal of Language and Culture, 11(3), 45-59.