Articles
| Open Access | Microbial Consortia for Climate-Resilient Yield Gains and Insurance-Ready Farming: Integrating PGPR Pathways with Farmers’ PMFBY Perceptions for Agricultural Risk Navigation
Abstract
Ensuring food security under intensifying climate variability requires agricultural strategies that raise productivity while reducing exposure to downside risk. Plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and multi-strain consortia have been widely discussed as biofertilizer pathways that enhance nutrient acquisition, stress tolerance, and crop performance across adverse soils and climatic pressures (Bhardwaj et al., 2014; Jha & Saraf, 2015; Agnihotri & Mitra, 2023). Yet, agronomic innovations do not diffuse in a vacuum: risk perceptions, trust, procedural burdens, and institutional design shape farmers’ willingness to adopt complementary risk-management instruments such as India’s Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) (Choudhury, 2020; Jha, 2021; Kumar & Soni, 2020; Prasuna, 2019). This article develops an integrated research frame that treats productivity gains and risk governance as mutually reinforcing components of climate-resilient livelihoods rather than separate policy silos. Drawing strictly on the provided literature, the study proposes and applies a field-oriented mixed qualitative design combining (a) a consortia-focused agronomic evaluation logic (root-zone functional complementarity, stress-context performance, and soil-health co-benefits) grounded in PGPR and microbial consortia scholarship (Panwar et al., 2014; Padmaperuma et al., 2018; García-Fraile et al., 2015) and (b) a farmer-perception and adoption-barrier analysis aligned with PMFBY awareness and implementation evidence (Ghanghas, 2018; Devi & Gupta, 2020; Suneja, 2022; Raghavan et al., 2022). Results are presented descriptively to show how farmers interpret microbial inputs through the lens of seasonal uncertainty, input-cost volatility, and the perceived reliability of insurance processes (Patra et al., 2016; Jha, 2021). The article advances a practical governance proposition: PGPR consortia can reduce production risk at the farm level, but insurance adoption and trust must be strengthened to convert biological resilience into financeable, scalable resilience at the system level (Prakash, 2021; Shukla & Patel, 2020).
Keywords
PGPR consortia, climate resilience, biofertilizers, farmers’ perceptions
References
Abhilash, P., Tripathi, V., Edrisi, S. A., et al. (2016). Sustainability of crop production from polluted lands. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 1(1), 54–65.
Agnihotri, P., & Mitra, A. K. (2023). Understanding the impact of global climate change on abiotic stress in plants and the supportive role of PGPR. In Abiotic Stress in Plants – Adaptations to Climate Change. IntechOpen.
Anwar, M. R., Liu, D. L., Macadam, I., & Kelly, G. (2013). Adapting agriculture to climate change: A review. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 113, 225–245.
Bhardwaj, D., Ansari, M. W., Sahoo, R. K., & Tuteja, N. (2014). Biofertilizers function as key players in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance, and crop productivity. Microbial Cell Factories, 13(1), 1–10.
Choudhury, A. (2020). Awareness and knowledge levels of PMFBY among farmers: A study in rural India. International Journal of Agricultural Policy, 9(3), 128–138.
Devi, K., & Gupta, S. (2020). Awareness of farmers regarding Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana. International Journal of Home Science, 6(3), 340–343.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2009). How to feed the world in 2050. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert_paper/How_to_Feed_the_World_in_2050.pdf
García-Fraile, P., Menéndez, E., & Rivas, R. (2015). Role of bacterial biofertilizers in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Bioengineering, 2(3), 183–205.
Ghanghas, B. S. (2018). Awareness of Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana among farmers of Haryana state. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(4), 1912–1914.
Grewal, A. (2017). Pesticide residues in food grains, vegetables and fruits: A hazard to human health. Journal of Medical Chemistry and Toxicology, 2(1), 1–7.
Gupta, S., & Gupta, K. (2020). Bioaccumulation of pesticides and its impact on biological systems. In Pesticides in Crop Production: Physiological and Biochemical Action (pp. 55–67).
Jha, C. K., & Saraf, M. (2015). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A review. Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 5(2), 108–119.
Jha, S. (2021). Procedural complexities in PMFBY: An analysis of crop-cutting experiments and their impact on farmers. Agricultural Policy Journal, 29(1), 85–94.
Joshi, N., Ruparelia, J. A., Saraf, M., & Jha, C. K. (2023). Techniques to study plant–microbe interactions that lead to efficient sustainable agriculture. In Plant Microbiome for Plant Productivity and Sustainable Agriculture (pp. 401–421). Springer.
Kavitha, V., & Nandhini, S. U. (2022). An analysis on farmers’ awareness and perception towards Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana scheme in Coimbatore District of Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Agricultural Statistics Sciences, 18(2).
Kumar, P., & Soni, S. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in the implementation of PMFBY in India. Indian Journal of Insurance and Risk Management, 10(3), 45–57.
Padmaperuma, G., Kapoore, R. V., Gilmour, D. J., & Vaidyanathan, S. (2018). Microbial consortia: A critical look at microalgae co-cultures for enhanced biomanufacturing. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 38(5), 690–703.
Panwar, M., Tewari, R., & Nayyar, H. (2014). Microbial consortium of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improves the performance of plants growing in stressed soils: An overview. In Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms (pp. 257–285).
Patra, S., Mishra, P., Mahapatra, S., & Mithun, S. (2016). Modelling impacts of chemical fertilizer on agricultural production: A case study on Hooghly district, West Bengal, India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(4), 1–11.
Prakash, M. (2021). Reforms in PMFBY: A step towards greater inclusivity. Indian Journal of Agricultural Insurance, 17(3), 54–63.
Prasuna, S. (2019). Barriers to effective communication and outreach in agricultural insurance schemes: A case study on PMFBY. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(2), 98–112.
Raghavan, S., Ramesh, R., & Pillai, S. (2022). Financial sustainability of PMFBY: A critical assessment. Indian Insurance Review, 12(2), 75–86.
Santhi, P., & Sangeetha, S. (2020). Prediction of farmers’ access to Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) scheme using discriminant analysis. SDMIMD Journal of Management, 11(2).
Shehrawat, A., Sharma, N., Shehrawat, P., & Bhakar, S. (2020). Awareness and performance of agricultural development schemes in the context of farmers’ welfare in Haryana. Economic Affairs, 65(2), 167–172.
Shukla, S., & Patel, R. (2020). The role of technology in enhancing agricultural insurance schemes: A review. Agricultural Innovation Journal, 16(2), 70–82.
Singh, S., Bhakar, S., & Shehrawat, P. S. (2020). Farmers’ awareness and performance about agriculture development schemes in Haryana. International Journal of Agricultural Innovation and Research, 8(5), 495–502.
Shrivastava, S., Egamberdieva, D., & Varma, A. (2015). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and medicinal plants: The state of the art. In Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Medicinal Plants (pp. 1–16).
Suneja, P. (2022). Awareness and perceptions of farmers towards Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana: An empirical study. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 35(1), 55–70.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Sofia J. Marenko, Dr. Emmanuel K. Adebayo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.