Participatory Forest Management (PFM) has emerged as a collaborative approach aimed at enhancing forest conservation while improving local livelihoods. This study assesses the community-perceived impacts of PFM on local livelihoods by examining the experiences and viewpoints of community members involved in PFM initiatives. Through a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews, data were collected from various communities engaged in PFM programs across diverse regions. The findings reveal that PFM initiatives have generally been perceived positively by local communities, contributing to various aspects of livelihood improvement.

Key benefits reported include increased access to forest resources, enhanced income through sustainable forestry practices, and improved community cohesion and capacity. Participants highlighted that PFM has facilitated better forest management, leading to the restoration of degraded areas and the protection of biodiversity, which in turn supports local economic activities.

However, challenges also emerged, including concerns about the equitable distribution of benefits, conflicts over resource use, and the adequacy of support provided to communities. Some respondents indicated that the benefits of PFM have not been uniformly experienced, with marginalized groups often facing difficulties in accessing the promised advantages. Additionally, the sustainability of PFM benefits was questioned, with some communities expressing concerns about the long-term effectiveness of management practices.

This study underscores the importance of addressing these challenges to maximize the positive impacts of PFM on local livelihoods. It suggests that for PFM to be more effective, it must ensure inclusive participation, equitable benefit-sharing, and ongoing support and adaptation to community needs. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders involved in forest management and community development, aiming to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of PFM programs.

Participatory Forest Management, community perceptions, local livelihoods

Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2001). Collective Action, Property Rights, and Decentralization in Resource Use in India and Nepal, J. Polit. Soc., 29: 4 December 2001 485-514. [Assessed October 2009].

Agrawal A, Ribot J (2000) Analyzing Decentralization: A Framewrok with South Asian and East African Cases; Environmental Governance in Africa Working paper Series World Resources Institute. Washington DC, www.wri.org [accessed 7th January 2010].

Arabuko Sokoke Forest Management team (2002) Arabuko Sokoke Forest Strategic Forest Management plan 2002 – 2027 prepared by the Arabuko Sokoke Forest Management team.

Bennun LA, Njoroge P (1999). Important Bird Areas in Kenya. Nairobi: Nature Kenya. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403:853-85.

Collar NJ, Stuart SN (1988). Key forests for threatened birds in Africa (Monograph Number 3) Cambridge, UK: International Council for Bird Preservation.

Government of Kenya (2001). The 1999 Population & Housing Census. Counting Our People for Development. Volume II. Pp. 363 International Fund for Agricultural Development (2007). Rural Poverty Portal. (http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/english/regions/africa /ken/index.htm).

Matiku P, Ogol C, Mireri C (2012). The Impact of Participatory Forest Management (PFM) on Forest Integrity and Biodiversity in Arabuko-Sokoke Kenya. Afr. J. Ecol., 50:184 192

Mbuvi MTE, AYIEMBA WO (2005). Sustained natural resources management and community livelihoods improvement through partnerships: The case of ArabukoSokoke forest Kenya, 1st International Congress on Successful Cases in Sustainable Development in the Tropics. 2nd – 4 th May 2005. Vera Cruz Mexico.

Mbuvi MTE, Wambua S, Ayiemba AO (2007). Assessing the social and economic costs and benefits of protected areas: The case of Arabuko-Sokoke forest reserve, Kenya. A report prepared for the Poverty and Environment Network, CARE International, Nairobi, September 2007.

Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (1994). The Kenya Forestry Master Plan Development Programmes. Government Printer, Nairobi.

Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (2007a). Participatory Forest Management Guidelines, Kenya Forest Service Nairobi Kenya

Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (2007b). Sessional Paper No: 1 of 2007 on Forest Policy, Government Printer Nairobi.

Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, (1994) Kenya Forestry Master Plan Development Programmes. Government Printer Nairobi.

Muriithi, Kenyon (2001), biodiversity and conservation in the Arabuko Sokoke Forest, Kenya. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 1437 - 1450