Participatory Forest Management (PFM) has emerged as a collaborative approach aimed at enhancing forest conservation while improving local livelihoods. This study assesses the community-perceived impacts of PFM on local livelihoods by examining the experiences and viewpoints of community members involved in PFM initiatives. Through a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews, data were collected from various communities engaged in PFM programs across diverse regions. The findings reveal that PFM initiatives have generally been perceived positively by local communities, contributing to various aspects of livelihood improvement.
Key benefits reported include increased access to forest resources, enhanced income through sustainable forestry practices, and improved community cohesion and capacity. Participants highlighted that PFM has facilitated better forest management, leading to the restoration of degraded areas and the protection of biodiversity, which in turn supports local economic activities.
However, challenges also emerged, including concerns about the equitable distribution of benefits, conflicts over resource use, and the adequacy of support provided to communities. Some respondents indicated that the benefits of PFM have not been uniformly experienced, with marginalized groups often facing difficulties in accessing the promised advantages. Additionally, the sustainability of PFM benefits was questioned, with some communities expressing concerns about the long-term effectiveness of management practices.
This study underscores the importance of addressing these challenges to maximize the positive impacts of PFM on local livelihoods. It suggests that for PFM to be more effective, it must ensure inclusive participation, equitable benefit-sharing, and ongoing support and adaptation to community needs. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders involved in forest management and community development, aiming to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of PFM programs.