Historians of education routinely draw on sources of very different kinds textbooks, novels, plays, journalism, autobiographies, editorial prefaces and treat them as interchangeable testimony to what an educator believed. This article argues that they are not interchangeable, and proposes an explicit hierarchy of evidential force ordered by genre. The instrument is developed and tested on a corpus in which the cost of ignoring genre is unusually visible: the writings of Hamza Hakimzade Niyazi (1889–1929), canonised in Soviet Uzbekistan as a revolutionary writer and edited accordingly. Three propositions that dominated the literature for half a century that he was irreligious, that he was a “singer of the revolution”, and that he stood apart from the Jadid school movement are re-tested against the corpus once its sources have been graded for reliability and ranked by genre. All three fail. The decisive counter-evidence in each case comes from the lowest-profile and least ideologically useful genres: the school primer, the school’s own administrative announcement, and the physical composition of a library. The article reports the outcome as a worked procedure rather than as a biographical revision, and closes by specifying the conditions under which the hierarchy applies and the two situations in which it should be suspended.
When the Primer Outranks the Poem: Genre, Evidential Force and The Reconstruction of Educational Thought in A Canonised Corpus
DOI:
Keywords:
Abstract
Downloads
References
Abdurahmonova, B. 2020. “Hamza asarlarining ta’lim bosqichlarida o‘rganilishi masalasi.” Pedagogik mahorat, no. 4.
Amonov, Sh. 2019. “Hamza she’riyati: manba va matn tadqiqi.” In Hamza va XX asr o‘zbek adabiyoti. Tashkent–Kokand.
Avloniy, A. 1992. Turkiy guliston yoxud axloq. Tashkent: O‘qituvchi.
Baldauf, I. 2001. “Jadidism in Central Asia within Reformism and Modernism in the Muslim World.” Die Welt des Islams 41 (1): 72–88.
Butterfield, H. 1931. The Whig Interpretation of History. London: G. Bell and Sons.
Chartier, R. 1994. The Order of Books. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Chevallard, Y. 1991. La transposition didactique. 2nd ed. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.
Depaepe, M. 2010. “The Ten Commandments of Good Practices in History of Education Research.” Zeitschrift für pädagogische Historiographie 16: 31–34.
Dobrenko, E. 2001. The Making of the State Writer. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Dolimov, U. 2006. Turkistonda jadid maktablari. Tashkent: Universitet.
Gadamer, H.-G. 2004. Truth and Method. 2nd rev. ed. New York: Continuum.
Genette, G. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greetham, D. C. 1994. Textual Scholarship: An Introduction. New York: Garland.
Hamza Hakimzoda Niyoziy. 1988. To‘la asarlar to‘plami. 5 vols. Vol. 2: Pedagogik risolalar. Nasr. Tashkent: Fan. [cited as TAT 2]
Jabborov, N. 2015. Zamon. Mezon. She’riyat. Tashkent: G‘afur G‘ulom.
Kamp, M. 2006. The New Woman in Uzbekistan. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Karimov, N. 2012. XX asr o‘zbek adabiyoti taraqqiyoti. Tashkent: Fan.
Keller, S. 2001. To Moscow, Not Mecca. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Khalid, A. 1998. The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform: Jadidism in Central Asia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Khalid, A. 2015. Making Uzbekistan: Nation, Empire, and Revolution in the Early USSR. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Qosimov, B. 2002. Milliy uyg‘onish: jasorat, ma’rifat, fidoyilik. Tashkent: Ma’naviyat.
Sharafiddinov, O. 2004. Ijodni anglash baxti. Tashkent: Sharq.
Skinner, Q. 1969. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8 (1): 3–53.
Tanselle, G. T. 1989. A Rationale of Textual Criticism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.