Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ijmscr/Volume05Issue12-14

Hydrosalpinx In The Era Of Fertility Preservation And IVF: Etiology, Management Strategies, And Reproductive Outcomes -An Evidence-Based Narrative Review

Shokhista Ismoilova , PhD, Assistant of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductology, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan

Abstract

Hydrosalpinx-the fluid-filled dilation of the fallopian tube secondary to distal tubal occlusion- remains a leading, potentially correctable cause of tubal factor infertility. Its pathophysiology (chronic inflammation, deciliation, fibrosis) and the embryotoxic/mechanical effects of intraluminal fluid substantially impair natural conception and assisted reproductive technology (ART) success. Objective: To synthesize contemporary evidence on the etiology, reproductive impact, diagnostic considerations, and management strategies for hydrosalpinx, with emphasis on fertility-preserving options and optimizing outcomes for women undergoing IVF. Methods: We performed a narrative evidence synthesis prioritizing high-quality sources (systematic reviews, meta-analyses, large cohorts, matched case–control studies, and guideline statements). Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using key terms related to hydrosalpinx, tubal infertility, IVF, salpingectomy, tubal occlusion, and embolization. Studies were appraised for methodological rigor and clinical relevance. Results: Conservative tubal surgery (salpingostomy/neosalpingostomy) yields pooled natural clinical pregnancy rates of ~25–33% in selected patients but carries a recurrence rate (~21%) and ectopic risk (~10%); outcomes are strongly severity dependent (mild disease → high success; severe disease → poor prognosis). Untreated hydrosalpinx reduces IVF implantation and pregnancy rates by ~50%; removal or occlusion of the affected tube before ART reliably improves live-birth rates. Interventional embolization is an emerging minimally invasive alternative with frozen-embryo transfer live-birth rates comparable to hydrosalpinx-free controls. Salpingectomy may increase risk of interstitial implantation in subsequent pregnancies; pediatric hydrosalpinx often has non-infectious etiologies and may resolve conservatively. Population data do not currently demonstrate a clear ovarian cancer-prevention benefit from salpingectomy performed for hydrosalpinx. Conclusions: Management should be individualized and severity-based: conservative repair may be appropriate for fertility-preserving candidates with mild disease, while salpingectomy, proximal occlusion, or embolization is recommended before IVF. Further prospective studies are needed to refine algorithms and evaluate long-term outcomes of minimally invasive approaches.

Keywords

Hydrosalpinx, tubal factor infertility, salpingostomy

References

Brunham RC, Gottlieb SL, Paavonen J. Chlamydia trachomatis infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2039-48. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1411426

Strandell A. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6(4):403-12. doi:10.1093/humupd/6.4.403

Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, Liu F, Demirol A, Gurgan T, et al. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(2):327-46. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt047

Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, Strandell A, Mol BW. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo IVF. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):1-8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.012

Zeyneloglu HB, Arici A, Olive DL. The effect of hydrosalpinx on reproductive outcome during IVF–embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(3):492-9. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00208-3

Das S., Mirzaeva D. PREVALENCE AND HEMATOLOGICAL PROFILES OF PREGNANCY ANEMIA: EXTENDED CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTER IN TASHKENT //Web of Medicine: Journal of Medicine, Practice and Nursing. – 2025. – Т. 3. – №. 5. – С. 146-150.

Mol BW, Ankum WM, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet. 2015;385(9963):1489-97. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60107-6

Brunham RC, Gottlieb SL, Paavonen J. Pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2039–48. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1411426.

Pankaj K. et al. ANXIETY IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: A GLOBAL REVIEW OF PREVALENCE AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS AMONG MEDICAL STUDENTS //International journal of medical sciences. – 2025. – Т. 1. – №. 4. – С. 13-18..

Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, Liu F, Demirol A, Gurgan T, et al. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(3):327–46. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt047.

Johnson NP, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, Strandell A, Mol BW. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo IVF. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1443–51. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.012.

Zeyneloglu HB, Arici A, Olive DL. The detrimental effect of hydrosalpinx on reproductive outcome in IVF cycles. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(3):492–5. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00208-3.

Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F, Wainer B, Merlet F, Nisand I, et al. Pregnancy rates after IVF in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(5):1136–9. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.3.593.

Mengliyeva, D., Shomaqsudova, M., et al. (2025). Fe3O4-Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Decorated on Graphene Oxide Nanosheets for Fast Detection of Trace Protein. Journal of Nanostructures, 15(4), 2071-2083. https://doi.org/10.22052/JNS.2025.04.047

Chu J, Harb HM, Gallos ID, Dhillon R, Al-Rshoud FM, Robinson L, et al. Salpingostomy in the treatment of hydrosalpinx: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(6):1882–95. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev135.

Kazmi Z, Gupta S. Best practice in management of paediatric and adolescent hydrosalpinges: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;195:40–51. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.042.

van Lieshout LAM, Piek JMJ, Verwijmeren K, Houterman S, Siebers AG, de Hullu JA, et al. Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy or hydrosalpinx: results of the OCASE nationwide population-based database study. Hum Reprod. 2020;36(3):616–25. doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa264.

Barbu LA, Mărgăritescu ND, Cercelaru L, Tenea Cojan TȘ, Stănică MC, Enăchescu I, et al. Long-term reproductive outcomes after Palmer-type neosalpingostomy in hydrosalpinx: a seven-year real-world cohort study. J Clin Med. 2025;14(22):8043. doi:10.3390/jcm14228043.

Guo H, Du T, Lyu Q, Wu L, Chai W, Zhu Q. Live birth rate and neonatal outcomes following interventional embolization of hydrosalpinx before frozen embryo transfer. Reprod Health. 2022;19(1):213. doi:10.1186/s12978-022-01522-7.

Wu WF, Yi JS, Xie X, Liu CB. Risk factor for interstitial pregnancy following ipsilateral salpingectomy: a retrospective matched case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):826. doi:10.1186/s12884-023-06132-0.

Petrucco OM. Surgery for hydrosalpinx—history, classification, incidence, results, and recommendations for management. Fertil Reprod Rev. 2024;Published online.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Shokhista Ismoilova. (2025). Hydrosalpinx In The Era Of Fertility Preservation And IVF: Etiology, Management Strategies, And Reproductive Outcomes -An Evidence-Based Narrative Review. International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research, 5(12), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijmscr/Volume05Issue12-14