data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/791c4/791c4a35340a58c26ec688f0df17fea84979283e" alt=""
MYRINGOPLASTY WITH APPLICATION XENOGRAFT FROM SHEEP PERICARDIA
Matkuliev K.M. , Researcher Tashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan Khasanov U.S. , Researcher Tashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan Rakhimjonova G.A. , Researcher Tashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan Bakieva Sh.K. , Researcher Tashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan Abdullaeva N.N. , Researcher Tashkent Medical Academy, UzbekistanAbstract
To date, there is no consensus on the question of which tissues are more appropriate to use for tympanic membrane plastic surgery. We decided to study the use of xenograft from sheep pericardium in myringoplasty in rabbits in the experiment, and in patients with chronic dry mesotympanitis. Experimental morphological studies using a xenograft were carried out in 28 rabbits. In the experiment, a positive result was obtained in 25 (89.3%) rabbits. In addition, 77 patients with dry perforation of the tympanic membrane were examined. To compare the results of the study, these patients underwent myringoplasty: 54 patients with the use of a xenograft from the sheep pericardium, 23 patients with the use of the fascia of the temporal muscle. Reliable engraftment of a xenograft from sheep pericardium after surgery was observed in 48 patients (88.9%), and with the use of temporal muscle fascia in 20 patients (86.9%).
Keywords
Xenograft,, myringoplasty,, temporal muscle fascia
References
Filippo N. et al. Biocompatibility evaluation criteria for novel xenograft materials: distribution and quantification of remnant nucleic acid and alpha-gal epitope. J Stem Cell Res Ther //J Stem Cell Res Ther S. – 2013. – Т. 6. – С. 2.
Ensari S. et al. The use of molded tympanic heterograft (lamb peritoneum) //Ear, nose & throat journal. – 1995. – Т. 74. – №. 7. – С. 487-489.
Daly K. A. et al. Effect of the αGal epitope on the response to small intestinal submucosa extracellular matrix in a nonhuman primate model //Tissue Engineering Part A. – 2009. – Т. 15. – №. 12. – С. 3877-3888.
Meddings R. N. Evaluation of collagen vicryl mesh as a dural graft substance : дис. – The University of Manchester (United Kingdom), 1992.
Aggarwal R., Saeed S. R., Green K. J. M. Myringoplasty //The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. – 2006. – Т. 120. – №. 6. – С. 429-432.
Darouassi Y. et al. Prognostic factors of myringoplasty: study of a 140 cases series and review of the literature //The Pan African Medical Journal. – 2019. – Т. 33.
Huang J. et al. Comparative efficacy of platelet-rich plasma applied in myringoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis //Plos one. – 2021. – Т. 16. – №. 1. – С. e0245968.
Schwam Z. G., Cosetti M. K. Endoscopic myringoplasty and type I tympanoplasty //Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. – 2021. – Т. 54. – №. 1. – С. 75-88.
Schwam Z. G., Cosetti M. K. Endoscopic myringoplasty and type I tympanoplasty //Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. – 2021. – Т. 54. – №. 1. – С. 75-88.
Lou Z. Endoscopic myringoplasty: comparison of double layer cartilage-perichondrium graft and single fascia grafting //Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery. – 2020. – Т. 49. – С. 1-9.
Demir E. et al. Endoscopic butterfly inlay myringoplasty for large perforations //European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. – 2019. – Т. 276. – С. 2791-2795.
Ersözlü T., Gultekin E. A comparison of the autologous platelet-rich plasma gel fat graft myringoplasty and the fat graft myringoplasty for the closure of different sizes of tympanic membrane perforations //Ear, Nose & Throat Journal. – 2020. – Т. 99. – №. 5. – С. 331-336.