PLAYING WITH WORDS: ANALYZING POLITICAL AGENDA AND DISCOURSE IN KENYA, UGANDA, AND TANZANIA DURING ELECTIONEERING AND REFERENDUM
Abstract
This research delves into the manipulation of words, terms, and idioms in the context of political agenda and discourse during electioneering and referendum campaigns in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania. The study investigates how politicians strategically use language to advance their political goals and shape public opinion. Through qualitative analysis of speeches, media interviews, and campaign materials, this research sheds light on the tactics employed to influence voters and gain support. The findings reveal the significance of linguistic strategies in framing political narratives, promoting specific ideologies, and constructing public perceptions. By understanding the intricacies of language manipulation in the political domain, this study aims to foster critical discourse awareness and inform the public about the complexities of political communication in East Africa.
Keywords
Language manipulation, political agenda, political discourseHow to Cite
References
BEARD, A. (2000): The Language of Politics, London: Routledge.
BREKLE, H. E. (1989): “War with words”, in: R. Wodak (Ed.), Language, Power and Ideology. Studies in Political Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 81-91.
BUTT, D. G. et al. (2004): “Grammar – the first covert operation of war”, Discourse & Society, 15(2-3), 267-290.
CHILTON, P. (2004): Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice, London: Routledge.
CLORAN, C. et al. (Eds.) (1996): Ways of Saying, Ways of Meaning: Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, London: Cassell.
DEDIAC, M. N. and D. NELSON (Eds.) (2003): At War with Words, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
HASAN, R. (1996): “What kind of resource is language?”, in: C. Cloran et al. (Eds.), Ways of Saying, Ways of Meaning: Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, London: Cassell.
GRAHAM, P. et al. (2004): “A call to arms at the end of history: a discourse-historical analysis of George W. Bush’s declaration of war on terror”, Discourse & Society, 15(2-3): 199-221.
LEUDAR, I. et al. (2004): “On membership categorization: ‘us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse”, Discourse & Society, 15(2-3), 243-266.
MARTIN, D.-C. (1995): “The choices of identity”, Social Identities, 1(1), 5-20.
Oxford University Press (2010): Oxford Advanced learners Dictionary (8 edn). Oxford. OUP.
RUUD, K. (2003): “Liberal parasites and other creepers: Rush Limbaugh, Ken Hamblin, and the discursive construction of group identities”, in: M. N. Dediac and D. Nelson (Eds.), At War with Words, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 27-62.
SARACENI, M. (2003): “The strange case of Dr Blair and Mr Bush: Counting their words to solve a mystery”, English Today 75, 3, 3-13.
SCHIFFRIN, D. et al. (Eds.) (2001): The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.