THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS: SAFEGUARDING INTERROGATIONAL FAIRNESS
Abstract
The principle of interrogational fairness is a cornerstone of the rule of law and human rights protection, particularly within the framework of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This study examines the mechanisms through which the ECHR safeguards the rights of individuals during interrogation processes, focusing on the interplay between human dignity, the right to a fair trial, and protections against inhumane treatment. Through a critical analysis of relevant case law and legal provisions, the research highlights how the Convention establishes a framework that obliges member states to adhere to standards of fairness, transparency, and accountability in interrogation practices. The study also explores the challenges and limitations faced by the ECHR in enforcing these rights, particularly in the context of national security concerns and counter-terrorism measures. By analyzing the impact of the ECHR on interrogational practices across different jurisdictions, this research aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of the importance of safeguarding interrogational fairness as a fundamental human right. Ultimately, the findings underscore the necessity for continuous dialogue and reform to ensure that the principles enshrined in the ECHR are effectively implemented in safeguarding individual rights during interrogations in an evolving legal landscape.
Keywords
Interrogational fairness, European Convention on Human Rights, inhumane treatmentHow to Cite
References
A Peculiar privilege in historical perspective
Self-incrimination in European human rights law-a pregnant pragmatism?
Europeanizing self-incrimination: the right to remain silent in the European court of human rights
Conflicting human rights: an exploration in the context of the right to a fair trial in the European convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms
Assisting and advising defendants before trial
Evidentiary barriers to conviction and two models of criminal procedure: a comparative study
Politics, research and symbolism in criminal justice: the right of silence and the police and criminal evidence act 1984
The fall and rise of torture: a comparative and historical analysis
The legal profession in the 1990s—images of change
The variable subject of the EU constitution, civil Liberties and human rights
Recent cases on pre-trial detention and delay in criminal proceedings in the European court of human rights
The role of the criminal defence lawyer in an inquisitorial procedure: legal and ethical constrains
Re-conceptualizing the right of silence as an effective fair trail standard
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lola Wu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.