Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume06Issue02-09

The Importance Of Proper Question Formulation In Criminal Investigations Using Layered Voice Analysis (LVA)

Kurbanov Elbek Elmuradovich , Andijan State Institute of Foreign Languages, Professor of the Department of English Language and Literature, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article examines the role of linguistically and pragmatically sound question formulation in criminal investigations employing Layered Voice Analysis (LVA). The study aims to theoretically substantiate that carefully constructed interrogative sentences significantly influence the quality of voice data obtained and, consequently, the reliability of interpreting the emotional and psychological state of the interviewee. The paper analyzes the theoretical foundations of LVA, linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects of interrogative constructions, and their impact on investigative procedures. The study concludes that an interdisciplinary approach integrating criminology, linguistics, and digital technologies is essential for the effective application of voice analysis tools.  

Keywords

Layered Voice Analysis, forensic linguistics, criminal investigation

References

Arguedas, M., & Pallotti, G. (2020). Question design and interactional control in institutional interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 168, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.004

Bull, R., & Milne, R. (2004). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. John Wiley & Sons.

Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D. (2016). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Fraser, H. (2018). The role of forensic linguistics in the criminal justice system. Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito, 5(2), 7–29.

Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(3), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160701645181

Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Wiley.

Heydon, G. (2015). The language of police interviewing. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hirschberg, J., & Shriberg, E. (2012). Detecting deception in speech. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2012 (pp. 1–4).

Köhnken, G. (1995). Interviewing suspects: Principles and practices. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350090303

Lacerda, F., & Eriksson, A. (2019). The forensic phonetic practitioner’s role in voice analysis. Journal of Phonetics, 73, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.12.002

Rock, F. (2011). Interpreting interrogatives in institutional discourse. Discourse Studies, 13(4), 465–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611405909

Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., & Blank, H. (2017). A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta-analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(4), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3330

Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Mann, S. (2010). Good liars. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 38(1–2), 77–98.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Kurbanov Elbek Elmuradovich. (2026). The Importance Of Proper Question Formulation In Criminal Investigations Using Layered Voice Analysis (LVA). American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research, 6(02), 36–38. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume06Issue02-09