Academic procrastination is often described as a voluntary delay of intended coursework despite awareness of negative consequences. Although motivational and emotional explanations have strong empirical support, a growing body of research suggests that procrastination is also meaningfully related to executive dysfunction, understood as difficulties in cognitive control processes that enable goal-directed behavior. From a cognitive control perspective, procrastination can be conceptualized as a breakdown in the capacity to maintain academic goals, resist competing temptations, initiate effort in the face of aversive affect, and flexibly regulate attention and action across time. This article synthesizes theoretical and empirical literature linking executive functions to procrastination in university students, with emphasis on how deficits in inhibition, working memory, goal maintenance, task switching, and emotion-related control may contribute to delays in starting and sustaining academic work. A narrative review approach is used to integrate evidence from self-report and performance-based executive function measures, findings from ADHD-related research, and cognitive neuroscience models of control including conflict monitoring and proactive versus reactive control. The reviewed evidence converges on the view that executive dysfunction is not merely an accompanying feature of procrastination but can operate as a psychological vulnerability that increases reliance on short-term mood repair and reward-driven choice at the expense of long-term academic goals. Implications for assessment, prevention, and intervention are discussed, highlighting the value of integrating cognitive control training, environmental design, and cognitive-behavioral techniques in university support services.  

Academic procrastination, executive dysfunction, executive functions

Steel P. The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure // Psychological Bulletin. 2007. Vol. 133, No. 1. P. 65–94. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65.

Kim K. R., Seo E. H. The relationship between procrastination and academic performance: A meta-analysis // Personality and Individual Differences. 2015. Vol. 82. P. 26–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.038.

Rabin L. A., Fogel J., Nutter-Upham K. E. Academic procrastination in college students: The role of self-reported executive function // Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2011. Vol. 33, No. 3. P. 344–357. DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2010.518597.

Gustavson D. E., Miyake A., Hewitt J. K., Friedman N. P. Evidence for shared genetic influences on self-control: Procrastination, goal-management, and executive function ability // Psychological Science. 2015. Vol. 26, No. 12. P. 1844–1854. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615608730.

Miller E. K., Cohen J. D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function // Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2001. Vol. 24. P. 167–202. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167.

Botvinick M. M., Braver T. S., Barch D. M., Carter C. S., Cohen J. D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control // Psychological Review. 2001. Vol. 108, No. 3. P. 624–652. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624.

Braver T. S. The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2012. Vol. 16, No. 2. P. 106–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010.

Diamond A. Executive functions // Annual Review of Psychology. 2013. Vol. 64. P. 135–168. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.

Friedman N. P., Miyake A. Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure // Cortex. 2017. Vol. 86. P. 186–204.

Karr J. E., Areshenkoff C. N., Rast P., Hofer S. M., Iverson G. L., Garcia-Barrera M. A. The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies // Psychological Bulletin. 2018. Vol. 144, No. 11. P. 1147–1185. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000160.

Sirois F. M., Pychyl T. A. Procrastination and the priority of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for future self // Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2013. Vol. 7, No. 2. P. 115–127. DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12011.

Sirois F. M. Procrastination and stress: A conceptual review of why context matters // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023. Vol. 20, No. 6. Art. 5031. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20065031.

Tice D. M., Baumeister R. F. Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling // Psychological Science. 1997. Vol. 8, No. 6. P. 454–458. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00460.x.

Rebetez M. M. L., Rochat L., Barsics C., Van der Linden M. Procrastination as a self-regulation failure: The role of impulsivity and intrusive thoughts // Personality and Individual Differences. 2018. Vol. 126. P. 49–54.

Rebetez M. M. L., Rochat L., Van der Linden M. Procrastination as a self-regulation failure: The role of inhibition, negative affect, and gender // Personality and Individual Differences. 2016. Vol. 101. P. 435–439.

Bolden J., Sibley M. H., Hains A. A., Mitchell J. T. “Tomorrow is the busiest day of the week”: Executive functions mediate the relation between procrastination and ADHD symptoms in college students // Journal of Attention Disorders. 2020. Vol. 24, No. 12. P. 1781–1790.

Barkley R. A. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD // Psychological Bulletin. 1997. Vol. 121, No. 1. P. 65–94. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65.

Rozental A., Forsell E., Svensson A., Andersson G., Carlbring P. Internet-based cognitive-behavior therapy for procrastination: A randomized controlled trial // Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2015. Vol. 76. P. 1–10.

Roth R. M., Isquith P. K., Gioia G. A. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function – Adult Version (BRIEF-A): Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 2005.