Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home
Login

American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2141
Published Article

Development And Psychometric Evaluation Of A Scoring System And Interpretation Guidelines For The Self-Comforting And Coping Scale (SCCS)

Development And Psychometric Evaluation Of A Scoring System And Interpretation Guidelines For The Self-Comforting And Coping Scale (SCCS)

Authors

  • Prof. Samuel K. O'Connell
    Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Keywords:

Self-comforting Coping Psychometric evaluation Scale development

Abstract

Background: Coping and self-comforting behaviors are critical components of psychological well-being and adaptive functioning [17, 21]. While existing scales measure facets of these constructs, a unified instrument integrating various theoretical frameworks is needed. The Self-Comforting and Coping Scale (SCCS) was developed as a novel measure to address this gap [23]. This study provides a comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the SCCS and establishes foundational guidelines for its scoring and interpretation.

Objectives: The primary objective was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the SCCS. Specific aims included confirming its factorial structure, assessing internal consistency, and examining its relationships with other established psychological measures, such as those for self-compassion and mindfulness.

Methods: A total of 350 university students participated in the study. Participants completed the SCCS along with several validated scales to assess convergent and discriminant validity [25]. Data analysis included confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the scale’s proposed structure, internal consistency checks using Cronbach's alpha, and correlation analyses to establish validity evidence.

Results: The CFA results confirmed the SCCS's proposed three-factor structure, with all fit indices meeting established criteria for a good model fit [7, 16]. The scale and its subscales demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.85 to 0.92. Convergent validity was supported by significant, positive correlations between SCCS scores and measures of self-compassion and psychological well-being [19]. A clear scoring system and preliminary interpretation guidelines were developed based on the study data.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that the SCCS is a psychometrically sound instrument with a robust factorial structure, strong internal consistency, and compelling validity evidence. This scale is a valuable new tool for researchers and practitioners interested in assessing an individual's self-comforting and coping behaviors, offering a more nuanced understanding of these critical psychological processes.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aliche, C.J., (2023). The mediating role of positive reappraisal and self-compassion on the relationship between mindfulness and posttraumatic growth in patients with cancer. South African Journal of Psychology, 53(1), pp.111-123.

Beck, J.S., 2020. Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond. Guilford Publications.

Boateng, G.O., Neilands, T.B., Frongillo, E.A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H.R. and Young, S.L., 2018. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in public health, 6, p.149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267

Clark, L.A. and Watson, D., 2019. Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological assessment, 31(12), p.1412.

Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87

Cudeck, R. and Browne, M.W., 1983. Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate behavioral research, 18(2), pp.147-167.

Davis, M. H. (2017). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Routledge.

DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Freire, C., Ferradás, M.D.M., Valle, A., Núñez, J.C. and Vallejo, G., (2016). Profiles of psychological well-being and coping strategies among university students. Frontiers in psychology, 7, p.1554.

Gilbert, P., (2010). Compassion focused therapy: Distinctive features. Routledge.

Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S. and Walach, H., (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis. Journal of psychosomatic research, 57(1), pp.35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00573-7

Kabat-Zinn, J., (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bpg016

Kavčič, T., Avsec, A. and Kocjan, G.Z., (2022). Coping profiles and their association with psychological functioning: A latent profile analysis of coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, p.111287.

Keng, S.L., Smoski, M.J. and Robins, C.J., (2011). Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies. Clinical psychology review, 31(6), pp.1041-1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006

Knekta, E., Runyon, C., & Eddy, S. (2019). One size doesn't fit all: Using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(1), rm1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.

Little, R.J. and Rubin, D.B., 2019. Statistical analysis with missing data. John Wiley & Sons.

Moreno-Montero, E., Ferradás, M.D.M. and Freire, C., (2024). Personal Resources for Psychological Well-Being in University Students: The Roles of Psychological Capital and Coping Strategies. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(10), pp.2686-2701. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14100177

Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027

Obohwemu, K.O., (2024). Protocol for a systematic review of self-comforting behaviours across theoretical frameworks: Examining patterns, mechanisms, and socio-cultural influences over 50 years. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals, 4(06), pp.30-39.

Obohwemu, K.O., Yakpir, G.M, Koretaine, S., et al., (2024). Self-Comforting Behaviours across Theoretical Frameworks: A 50-Year Systematic Review of Patterns, Mechanisms, and Socio-Cultural Influences. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 6(12), pp.51-177.

Obohwemu, K., (2025). Theory and psychometric development of the Self-Comforting and Coping Scale (SCCS): A novel measure of self-comforting behaviors. Global Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), pp.6-22.

Schafer, J.L. and Graham, J.W., (2002). Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychological methods, 7(2), p.147.

Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127

Zhang, S., Rehman, S., Zhao, Y. et al. Exploring the interplay of academic stress, motivation, emotional intelligence, and mindfulness in higher education: a longitudinal cross-lagged panel model approach. BMC Psychol 12, 732 (2024).