The Prospects of Implementing Finnish Experience in The Field of School Education in Uzbekistan

Authors

  • Yuldashev Ulugbek Kadirjanovich Department of Social Sciences, University of Business and Science, Namangan, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume05Issue05-09

Keywords:

School administration, educational management, educational quality assessment

Abstract

The government of Uzbekistan is currently focusing on reforms in the education system. International experiences, particularly in school education, have been studied to identify the achievements of developed countries. Implementing Finland's experience, which has made significant progress in school education and whose students have achieved high results in the PISA test in recent years, is now a top priority. This article compares aspects of the school education systems of Uzbekistan and Finland, analyzing the prospects of introducing Finnish experience. It specifically addresses education management, economic factors, types of schools, and stages of education, with each aspect concluding with insights into the specifics of the Finnish experience. This article explains the differences between Uzbek and Finnish schools based on historical approaches. Therefore, the methods of history were mainly used in this article. Investigating the data from the official documents helped to understand the government’s policy in school education in Uzbekistan. The articles and books written by researchers were main resources for uncovering the specific characters in Finnish school education system.  Historical background of Finnish school management system might help to understand how Finnish experience can solve problems of school education system in Uzbekistan. The article analyses whether the outcomes of recent reforms in school education in Uzbekistan might tackle the issues of implementing Finnish experience in this area. Furthermore, it suggests that giving more authority for schools and teachers like in Finland might be a solution for some problems of Uzbek school management system. However, final results might be related to people’s societal worldview about education which includes the reputation of teachers in society.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cabinet of Ministers. (2017). Umumiy o‘rta ta’lim to‘g‘risidagi nizomni tasdiqlash haqida [About the approval of the regulation on general secondary education].

https://lex.uz/docs/-3137130?ONDATE=22.03.2017%2000

Cabinet of Ministers. (2018). Xalq ta’limi tizimida ta’lim sifatini baholash sohasidagi xalqaro tadqiqotlarni tashkil etish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida [On the measures of organization of international studies in the field of evaluation of the quality of education in the public education system].

https://lex.uz/docs/-4097073

Cabinet of Ministers. (2020). Ijod maktablari va ixtisoslashtirilgan maktablar faoliyatini yanada takomillashtirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida [On measures to further improve the activities of creative schools and specialized schools].

https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-4761058

Cabinet of Ministers. (2021). Samarqand Davlat Universitetining O‘zbekiston-Finlyandiya Pedagogika instituti faoliyatini tashkil etish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida [On measures to organize the activities of the Uzbekistan-Finland Pedagogical Institute of Samarkand State University].

https://lex.uz/docs/-5482927

Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). Tashkent: Uzbekistan.

Kauko, J. (2019). The Finnish Comprehensive School: Conflicts, Compromises and Institutional Robustness / Great Policy Successes. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Murtazayeva, R. Ermetov, A. & Odilov, A. (Eds.). (2022). O‘zbekistonning eng yangi tarixi [The latest history of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent: National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirza Ulugbek.

Oliy Majlis. (2019). Kasaba uyushmalari to‘g‘risida. [On trade-unions].

https://lex.uz/docs/-4631281

Oliy Majlis. (2020). Ta’lim to‘g‘risida [On Education].

https://lex.uz/docs/-5013007

Pulatov, U. (2023). Nima uchun maktablarga mustaqillik kerak? [Why do schools need independence?], Ma’rifat, 15 March.

Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: what can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Second edition. New York: Teachers College Press.

Säntti, J. & Salminen, J. (2015). Development of Teacher Education in Finland 1945-2015. Hungarian educational research journal, 5(3), 13.

Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41(4), 458.

Simola, H. Kauko, J. Varjo, J. Kalalahti, M. & Sahlstrom, F. (2017). Dynamics in education politics. Understanding and explaining the Finnish case. New York: Routledge.

Statistics Agency. (2023). Nominal hisoblangan o‘rtacha oylik ish haqi. [Nominal average monthly salary]. Tashkent.

Taipale, I. (Ed.) (2019). Finlandiyaning 100 ijtimoiy innovatsiyasi / Finlandiya qanday qilib Finlandiya bo‘ldi: siyosiy, ijtimoiy va maishiy innovatsiyalar. [100 social innovations from Finland / How Finland became Finland – political, social and hands-on inventions]. Tashkent: Sharq.

The President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020). Pedagogik ta’lim sohasini yanada rivojlantirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida [On measures for further development of the field of pedagogical education].

https://lex.uz/docs/-4749364

Thrupp, M. Seppänen, P. Kauko, J. & Kosunen, S. (Eds.) (2023). Finland’s famous education system. Unvarnished insights into Finnish schooling. Singapore: Springer.

Walker, T. (2023). Финландия таълим мўжизаси: Ҳамма гап танаффусдами? Мароқли дарс ўтишнинг 33 сири. [Teach like Finland: 33 simple strategies for joyful classrooms]. Tashkent: Global books.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-08

How to Cite

Yuldashev Ulugbek Kadirjanovich. (2025). The Prospects of Implementing Finnish Experience in The Field of School Education in Uzbekistan. American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research, 5(05), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume05Issue05-09