This article presents the theoretical foundations and algorithm for the practical implementation of an original methodological approach developed by the author — the metacognitive angle method (MAM). The metacognitive angle refers to the mental space where the student's cognitive processes (thinking, learning, problem-solving) intersect with metacognitive processes (observation, evaluation, and management of one's own thinking). The study, based on J. Dewey's experiential pedagogy, J. Flavell's theory of metacognition, L.S. Vygotsky's zone of proximal development, D. Kolb's experiential learning cycle, and B. Zimmerman's self-regulated learning model, forms the conceptual foundations of MAM. The article presents a seven-stage algorithm for the practical implementation of the method, its adapted version for university students, and criteria for evaluating effectiveness. The research results introduce a new methodological tool into scientific discourse for the development of metacognitive competencies of students in higher educational institutions.
Metacognitive Angle Method: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Application Algorithm
DOI:
Keywords:
Abstract
Downloads
References
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2022-yil 28-yanvardagi PF-60-sonli "2022-2026-yillarga mo’ljallangan Yangi O’zbekistonning taraqqiyot strategiyasi to’g'risida"gi Farmoni. – Toshkent, 2022.
[MUALLIFNING DISSERTATSIYASI YOKI BOSHQA ASARI – aniqlashtirish kerak]
Dewey J. Democracy and Education. – New York: Macmillan, 1916. – 434 p.
Kolb D.A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. 2nd ed. – Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, 2015. – 416 p.
Schraw G., Dennison R.S. Assessing metacognitive awareness // Contemporary Educational Psychology. – 1994. – Vol. 19, No. 4. – P. 460–475.
Talabalarda sanogen refleksiyani shakllantirish // Farg'ona metodik maktabi jurnali. – 2023.
Flavell J.H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry // American Psychologist. – 1979. – Vol. 34, No. 10. – P. 906–911.
Brown A.L. Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms // Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding / F.E. Weinert, R.H. Kluwe (eds.). – Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1987. – P. 65–116.
Talabalarni refleksiv qobiliyatini shakllantirishning nazariy asoslari // Modern Science and Research. – 2025.
Zimmerman B.J. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective // Handbook of Self-Regulation. – San Diego: Academic Press, 2000. – P. 13–39.
Nicol D., McCallum S. Making internal feedback explicit: Exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. – 2022. – Vol. 47, No. 3. – P. 424–443.
Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. – Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1986. – 617 p.
Dewey J. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. – Boston: D.C. Heath, 1933. – 301 p.
Education Endowment Foundation. Metacognition and Self-regulation. – London: EEF, 2024. – URL: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/teaching-learning-toolkit/metacognition-and-self-regulation
Vygotskiy L.S. Pedagogicheskaya psixologiya. – Moskva: Pedagogika-Press, 1996. – 536 b.
Pintrich P.R. The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing // Theory into Practice. – 2002. – Vol. 41, No. 4. – P. 219–225.