The paper reviews briefly research outcomes and debate around university autonomy in the global world. Different types of autonomy and components are discussed together with pre-requisites for the process of moving towards independent organizational governance. The role of stakeholders and their expectations are presented.
COMPONENTS OF UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY – EXPECTATIONS AND FACTORS FOR DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
Keywords:
Abstract
Downloads
References
Vasiliev, I. A., Diveeva, N. I., Dmitrikova, E. A., Kashaeva, A. A., & Sheveleva, N. A. (2020). Autonomy of universities: a necessary condition for the development of Russian higher education in the context of digitalization. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Law, 11(4), 877-902.
Verbitskaya, L., & Kasevich, V. (2006). Institutional autonomy and the problem of management in higher education. Higher education in Russia, (7), 16-20.
Knyazev, E. A. (2014). Autonomy of Universities: Personalist-Axiological Approach. Universum: psychology and education, (5-6 (6)), 3.
Nikolsky, B. (2008). University autonomy and academic freedom. Higher education in Russia, (6), 147-155.
Muminov, N. G. (2015). Features and composition of higher education in European countries. Modern education (Uzbekistan), (1), 4-12.
Choi, S. (2019). Identifying indicators of university autonomy according to stakeholders’ interests. Tertiary education and management, 25, 17-29.
Estermann, T., Nokkala, T., & Steinel, M. (2011). University autonomy in Europe II. The scorecard. brussels: European university association.
Fumasoli, T., Gornitzka, A., & Maassen, P. (2014). University autonomy and organizational change dynamics.