The article discusses the terminological layer of English and Uzbek languages in terms of “Crime” semantics. The author highlights distinctive features of legal terms and scrutinizes the reasons for lexical gaps that occurred in languages. The semantical relations between terms are analyzed and compared according to the principles of structural linguistics. It is important to determine the relationship between law and language in the establishment of a democratic legal state of any country. The fact that law is applied to every sphere of life and that no person is outside the scope of law further strengthens this idea.
CRIMINAL TERMINOLOGY IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
DOI:
Keywords:
Term
terminology
law
Abstract
References
Abdullaeva F. (2018) Organization of Lingua didactic principles for teaching legal terms. Thesis, Tashkent.
Brenes P. Terminology for beginners. E-book.
British Columbia Government, Glossary of Criminal Justice terms. gov.bc.ca.
Cestaro J. (2019) Types of criminal offences in the UK. Legal insights and resources. Lawtonslaw.co.uk
Cabre M., Sager J. (1999) Terminology: theory, methods, and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute, law.cornell.edu.
International Organization for Standardization 1087. iso.org
Kuchimov Sh. (2004) Scientific and theoretical problems of expressing legal norms in Uzbek. Tashkent.
Pavel S., Nolet D. (2001) Handbook of terminology. Translation Bureau.
Riggs F. (1989) Terminology and lexicography: their complementarity. Ins. For Terminology Research.
Thomas P. (1993) Choosing headwords from language-for-special-purposes (LSP) collocations for entry into a terminology data bank (term bank). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.