Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume06Issue02-10

The Intonation Of The Uzbek Language In The Context Of Digital Technologies: Analysis, Modelling, And Applications

Cholliyeva Gulchehra Toshpolot qizi , Doctoral Student (DSc), Bukhara State University, Bukhara, Republic of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan

Abstract

The intonational system of the Uzbek language, a major Turkic language spoken by about 35 million people, is thoroughly examined in this essay as it relates to the revolutionary field of digital technology. While Uzbek intonation's phonological functions and syntactic correlations have been established by traditional linguistic scholarship, the digital paradigm presents new approaches, difficulties, and wide-ranging applications for its analysis, computational modelling, and deployment. In order to clarify how cutting-edge methods—such as large-scale annotated corpora, machine learning (ML), deep neural networks (DNNs), text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis, automatic speech recognition (ASR), and large language models (LLMs)—are radically changing the understanding and application of Uzbek prosody, this study integrates insights from phonetics, corpus linguistics, computational linguistics, and speech technology. We contend that a synergistic, multidisciplinary strategy that closely combines in-depth empirical phonetic analysis with advanced computer modelling is necessary for the creation of linguistically accurate, natural-sounding, and socially inclusive digital applications for Uzbek. The paper also looks at important applications in human-computer interface (HCI), assistive technologies, dialectal preservation, and computer-assisted language learning (CALL). The special difficulties presented by Uzbek's agglutinative morphology, comparatively free word order, and notable dialectal differences in intonation patterns—all of which need for specialized solutions different from those for Indo-European languages—are highlighted. We wrap up by providing a research roadmap, highlighting the necessity of extensive, publicly accessible digital resources to maintain the language's vitality and technical sovereignty in the twenty-first century.

Keywords

Uzbek language, intonation, prosody

References

Boeschoten, H. (1998). Uzbek. In L. Johanson & É. Á. Csató (Eds.), The Turkic Languages (pp. 357-378). Routledge.

Kamiljanova, D. (2020). Some Features of Intonation in the Uzbek Language. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 22(2), 285-289.

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2023). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.3.09. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/

Shen, J., Pang, R., Weiss, R. J., Schuster, M., Jaitly, N., Yang, Z., ... & Wu, Y. (2018). Natural TTS synthesis by conditioning WaveNet on mel spectrogram predictions. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 4779-4783. IEEE.

Jun, S.-A. (Ed.). (2014). Prosodic Typology II: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford University Press.

Nabiyev, R., & Khodjaev, A. (2021). Issues of Developing a Text-to-Speech System for the Uzbek Language. 2021 International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT), 1-4. IEEE.

Djuraev, A., & Khamdamov, U. (2019). Creation of Speech Corpus for the Uzbek Language and its Application in Speech Recognition. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 16(2), 1020-1026.

Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

Konrot, A. (1981). Physical correlates of linguistic stress in Turkish. University of Essex Language Centre Occasional Papers, 24, 26-53.

Ceplö, S., & Bátora, J. (2016). Questions in Uzbek. Slovak Academy of Sciences.

Karimov, R., & Mukhamedov, A. (2018). On the phonetic nature of exclamatory sentences in modern Uzbek language. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 5(3), 45-51.

Kornflit, J. (1997). Turkish. Routledge.

Ergun, H. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Uzbek Dialects. Turkic Studies Series.

Tokuda, K., Yoshimura, T., Masuko, T., Kobayashi, T., & Kitamura, T. (2000). Speech parameter generation algorithms for HMM-based speech synthesis. 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 3, 1315-1318.

Zen, H., Senior, A., & Schuster, M. (2013). Statistical parametric speech synthesis using deep neural networks. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 7962-7966.

Vogel, I., & Kenesei, I. (1987). The interface between phonology and other components of grammar. Phonology Yearbook, 4, 243-263.

Steedman, M. (2000). Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), 649-689.

Khodjaev, A., & Najmiddinov, B. (2022). UzSpeech: A Large-Scale Uzbek Speech Corpus for Automatic Speech Recognition. Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), 6889-6895.

Li, L., & Tang, H. (2021). Dialect adaptation for speech recognition and synthesis: A survey. *IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 29*, 2862-2876.

Shen, J., Pang, R., Weiss, R. J., Schuster, M., Jaitly, N., Yang, Z., ... & Wu, Y. (2018). Natural TTS synthesis by conditioning WaveNet on mel spectrogram predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05884.

Kong, J., Kim, J., & Bae, J. (2020). HiFi-GAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Efficient and High Fidelity Speech Synthesis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 17022-17033.

Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A., Hakkani-Tür, D., & Tür, G. (2000). Prosody-based automatic segmentation of speech into sentences and topics. Speech Communication, 32(1-2), 127-154.

Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2002). Feedback in computer-assisted pronunciation training: Technology push or demand pull?. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP).

Edwards, A. D. (1995). Computers and people with disabilities. Computers and society, 25(2), 16-21.

Bird, S., & Simons, G. F. (2003). Seven dimensions of portability for language documentation and description. Language, 79(3), 557-582.

Bannard, C., & Li, X. (2022). Predicting prosody from text with pre-trained language models. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 11289-11301.

Wang, Y., Stanton, D., Zhang, Y., Skerry-Ryan, R. J., Battenberg, E., Shor, J., ... & Saurous, R. A. (2020). Style tokens: Unsupervised style modeling, control and transfer in end-to-end speech synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.09017.

Qizi, C. G. T. Intonation. Intonema, its structure. Functions of intonema. Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 8, 142-141.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Cholliyeva Gulchehra Toshpolot qizi. (2026). The Intonation Of The Uzbek Language In The Context Of Digital Technologies: Analysis, Modelling, And Applications. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 6(02), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume06Issue02-10