This article provides an in-depth analysis of the theoretical foundations, advantages, and limitations of the structured interview method. It highlights the method’s ability to standardize data collection, increase objectivity, and facilitate statistical processing in research. Furthermore, the study discusses the limitations of structured approaches, such as reduced flexibility and insufficient depth in capturing contextual information. The findings indicate that while the structured interview is an effective tool for empirical research, it should be applied with careful methodological consideration.

Structured interview, research methods, data standardization

Bergelson, I. (2022). Best Practices for Reducing Bias in the Interview Process. PMC, p. 12.

Bill, B. (2024). Are traditional interviews more prone to effects of impression management than highly structured ones? Journal of Applied Psychology, p. 45.

Huffcutt, A. I. (2023). Structured interviews: moving beyond mean validity… Industrial and Organizational Psychology, p. 95.

Hartwell, C. J. (2019). Are we asking the right questions? Predictive validity of interview questions. Journal of Business Research, p. 101.

Döringer, S. (2021). The problem‑centred expert interview: Combining structure and flexibility in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, pp. 33‑50.

Lin, J. C., et al. (2024). Evidence‑Based Practices for Interviewing Graduate Applicants. PMC, pp. 5.

https://daryo.uz/2025/11/18/barchasini-uddalash-mumkin-kriptoekspert-abdurahmon-ruhillayev-bilan-katta-intervyuu/?utm

https://kun.uz/news/interview?utm_sourcem