Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue11-58

Factors In Ordinary Discourse In Linguistics: Gender, Social Stratification, And Cultural Context

Turaxodjayeva Moxidil Obidjonovna , Doctor of philosophy (PhD) in philological sciences, senior teacher of Andijan branch of Kokand university, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article is devoted to an in-depth study of the topic "Factors expressing belonging in discourse in linguistics: gender, social stratification and cultural context". The article analyzes, from the point of view of linguistics, the concept of belonging and its role in the communicative process. It examines how belonging is formed in communication between people, how gender roles, social stratification and cultural context can influence this process. The article first of all covers the theoretical foundations of the concept of belonging, and then analyzes the ways in which gender and social stratification factors are reflected in discourse. Gender roles, for example, differences in communication between men and women, and their expression through language are considered. Social stratification, in turn, determines the positions of people from different social classes in communication. The importance of cultural context is also given special attention. It analyzes how the ways in which belonging is expressed in different cultures can differ, as well as the role of traditions and values in the communicative process. This study helps to clarify the connection between social identity and role through language and communication, and also serves to understand the complexity of communication in modern society. The results of the article provide valuable information for researchers in the fields of linguistics, psychology and sociology and may open new directions for future research. It is also expected that this study will be useful in discussions on issues of social justice and equality.

Keywords

Discourse, gender, social stratification

References

Holmes, J. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.1995, 131p.

Eckert, P., McConnell-Ginet, S. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.2003, 179p.

Bourdieu, P. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.1991, 157p.

Tannen, D. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow.1990, 114p.

Gumperz, J. J. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.2002, 92p.

Blum-Kulka, S., Olshtain, E. Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns. Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 193-213pp.

Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.2009, 52p.

Lakoff, R. Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper Row.2015, 102p.

Gee, J. P. How to Do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. New York: Routledge.2014, 95p.

Scollon, R., Scollon, S. W.Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.2003, 78p.

Kress, G., vanLeeuwen, T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.2006, 55p.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. 1994, 50(4), 696-735pp.

Cameron, D. Language, Gender, and Sexuality: Current Issues and New Directions. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2007, 89p.

Ochs, E., Schieffelin, B. B. Language Has a Heart, Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader in Language and Culture. New York: Wiley. 2009, 220p.

Mills, S. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.2003, 75p.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Turaxodjayeva Moxidil Obidjonovna. (2025). Factors In Ordinary Discourse In Linguistics: Gender, Social Stratification, And Cultural Context. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 5(11), 258–263. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue11-58