Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue11-56

Linguopragmatic Means And Their Manifestation In Mediadiscourse

Makhliyo Diyorova , Karshi State University,researcher of the department of Linguistics, Uzbekistan

Abstract

The study of linguopragmatic means has become an essential part of modern linguistics, focusing on how language is used to achieve communicative goals in specific contexts. Linguopragmatic devices help speakers express intentions, manage interpersonal relations, and influence the addressee. This paper explores the theoretical foundations of linguopragmatics, examines various linguopragmatic means such as speech acts, implicatures, presuppositions, politeness strategies, and discourse markers, and highlights their manifestation in English speech practices.

Keywords

Linguopragmatics, speech acts, implicature, discourse markers

References

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Makhliyo Diyorova. (2025). Linguopragmatic Means And Their Manifestation In Mediadiscourse. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 5(11), 252–255. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue11-56