Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home

American Journal of Philological Sciences

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2273
Published Article

National-Cultural And Spiritual Characteristics Of The Concept “Ko‘Z” In The Uzbek Language

National-Cultural And Spiritual Characteristics Of The Concept “Ko‘Z” In The Uzbek Language

  • Shabanova Sevinj Djumaliyevna
    Uzbekistan State University of World Languages, Foundation PhD student, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Shabanova Sevinzh Djumaliyevna
    PhD Student, Uzbekistan State World Languages University, Uzbekistan
Cognitive linguistics concept “ko‘z” cultural semantics linguoculture

The concept “ko‘z” (eye) constitutes one of the fundamental and culturally salient units within the Uzbek linguistic worldview. Far exceeding its primary physiological function, ko‘z operates as a multilayered cognitive construct that encodes perceptual, emotional, ethical, aesthetic, and spiritual meanings. In Uzbek culture, the eye functions as a symbolic medium through which individuals interpret human character, express social relations, regulate communicative behaviour, and conceptualize moral-spiritual values. The present study offers a comprehensive examination of the semantic architecture and linguocultural specificity of the concept “ko‘z” by drawing on key theoretical frameworks in cognitive linguistics and cultural semiotics, particularly the works of Popova and Sternin on conceptual structure, Karasik’s cultural discourse theory, and Lotman’s semiotic space.

Using data from Uzbek phraseology, proverbs, classical literature, folklore, and everyday communicative practices, the analysis demonstrates that ko‘z represents a culturally encoded mechanism for modelling perception, moral evaluation, emotional transparency, social hierarchy, modesty norms, and spiritual insight. The findings reveal that the concept “ko‘z” plays a central role in constructing the symbolic universe of the Uzbek people, reflecting deeply ingrained national mentality, collective memory, and value orientations. As such, the study contributes to a broader understanding of how culturally significant concepts structure linguistic consciousness and mediate the relationship between language, culture, and cognition in the Uzbek context.

Popova, Z. D., & Sternin, I. A. Cognitive Linguistics. Voronezh: Istoki, 2007. 250 p.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. 242 p.

Wierzbicka, A. Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 368 p.

Karasik, V. I. Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. 389 p.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 345 p.

Lotman, Yu. M. The Semiosphere. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPb, 2000. 704 p.

Yuldashev, Q. Artistic Thinking and Metaphor. Tashkent: Fan, 1998. 210 p.

Mamatqulova, G. Artistic Imagery in Uzbek Phraseology. Tashkent: Universitet, 2014. 176 p.

Qosimov, B. Philosophy of Life and Language. Tashkent: Akademnashr, 2010. 192 p.