Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home

American Journal of Philological Sciences

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2273
Published Article

Sociolinguistic Analysis of Imprecations Through Theoretical Lenses: A Comparative Study Across Uzbek, Russian, And English Societies

Sociolinguistic Analysis of Imprecations Through Theoretical Lenses: A Comparative Study Across Uzbek, Russian, And English Societies

  • Raykhona Gulomova
    Senior teacher, Uzbekistan State World Languages University, Uzbekistan
Imprecations sociolinguistics performativity,

This article explores the sociolinguistic significance of imprecations (curses) as a discursive practice embedded in cultural norms, gender dynamics, and power structures. Through an integrated comparison of the theoretical insights of William Labov, Erving Goffman, Deborah Tannen, Janet Holmes, Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu, and Judith Butler, the study evaluates how curses function as expressions of identity, resistance, and social control in Uzbek, Russian, and English-speaking societies. Using a comparative sociolinguistic methodology, it demonstrates how curses operate across social strata, genders, and communicative contexts. The findings underscore the performative, symbolic, and stratifying functions of imprecations, while revealing their discursive potential to resist and reproduce social hierarchies.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press.

Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality: Volume I. Pantheon.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Anchor Books.

Holmes, J. (1995). Women, Men and Politeness. Longman.

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. Ballantine Books.