Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue05-09

Challenges of Syntactic Markup in The Uzbek Language

Dilnoza Khamdamova , Karshi state university, teacher, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article explores the key challenges related to syntactic markup in the Uzbek language. As an agglutinative language with free word order, Uzbek presents significant difficulties for natural language processing (NLP). Particular attention is paid to morphological ambiguity, the lack of large-scale annotated corpora, and the insufficient adaptation of algorithms to the linguistic specificities of Uzbek. Solutions are proposed, including the development of specialized corpora, adaptation of existing machine learning models, and the creation of new markup algorithms tailored to the language.

Keywords

Syntactic markup, Uzbek language, morphology

References

Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S. J., & McClosky, D. (2014). The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit. In ACL (System Demonstrations).

Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In NAACL-HLT.

Universal Dependencies Project. (2024). https://universaldependencies.org/

Tursunov, B. (2019). Linguistic features of the Uzbek language: Morphology and syntax. Tashkent State University Journal.

Nasriddinov, S., & Abdullaeva, M. (2022). Building NLP Tools for Uzbek Language: Resources and Challenges. In Proceedings of the Turkic Languages NLP Workshop.

Özçelik, O., & Güngör, T. (2018). A comparative study on syntactic markup of agglutinative languages. In Journal of Language Modelling.

Khamdamova D. Comparative analysis of syntactic markup in English and Uzbek: achievements, challenges, and prospects. Journal of University of Mangement and Future Technologies

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Dilnoza Khamdamova. (2025). Challenges of Syntactic Markup in The Uzbek Language. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 5(05), 29–31. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue05-09