Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue02-32

Comparative analysis of metaphorical expressive means in Russian and Uzbek languages

Sultanova Durdona Abulkhayr qizi , Trainee Teacher, GGTI (Gulistan State Pedagogical Institute), Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article carries out a comparative analysis of the metaphoric expressive means in Russian and Uzbek languages. The aim of the study is to identify the similarities and differences in the use of metaphors in the two linguistic systems, as well as to examine the influence of cultural-historical and cognitive factors on the formation of metaphoric images. The research employs methods of comparative analysis, corpus studies, and cognitive-semantic analysis, allowing for the observation of both traditional and modern tendencies in the functioning of metaphor in artistic and journalistic texts. Special attention is given to the analysis of imagery, the structural organization of metaphoric constructions, and their role in forming the emotional and semantic richness of utterances. The results indicate that, despite certain universal characteristics of metaphoric thinking, each language culture possesses its own specific metaphorical models that reflect the historical experience and worldview of its speakers.

Keywords

Metaphor, comparative analysis, imagery, cognitive semantics

References

Лакофф Дж., Джонсон М. Метафоры, ко-торыми мы живем/ под ред. А.Н. Баранова. М.: Едиториал, УРСС, 2004.

Потебня А.А. Теоретическая поэтика. М.: Высш. шк., 1990.

Mirtojiev M. Lingvistik metaforalar tasnifi // O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti. –1973. –No 4. –B. 34-37.

Qobuljonova G. Metaforaning sistemaviy lingvistik talqini: Filol. fan. nomz. diss. – Toshkent, 2000. – B. 30.

Rahmatullayev Sh. Hozirgi adabiy o’zbek tili. – Toshkent: Universitet, 2006. 66 b.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Sultanova Durdona Abulkhayr qizi. (2025). Comparative analysis of metaphorical expressive means in Russian and Uzbek languages. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 5(02), 112–115. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue02-32