PRAGMATIC FEATURES OF FAMILY EDUCATION TERMINOLOGY IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK
Abstract
This article explores the pragmatic features of family education-related terminology in English and Uzbek. Through an analysis of the usage of key terms in different social and cultural contexts, the study reveals how language reflects the norms, traditions, and societal structures of both cultures. The findings demonstrate that, while the core concept of family education is shared, the pragmatic applications of the terms differ significantly due to the diverse cultural frameworks.
Keywords
Family Education, Social Context, Cultural NormsHow to Cite
References
Antipov, E. M., & Donskikh, O. A. (1989). Culture and Language: The Interaction of Social and Linguistic Factors. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Freidenberg, O. M. (1998). Myth and Literature of Antiquity. Moscow: Nauka Publishing.
Ivanova, T. V. (2004). The Development of the Category of Quantity in Language. Moscow: Moscow State University Press.
Klyuchnikov, A. V. (1996). Symbolism in World Culture: Numbers and Signs. Moscow: Nauka Publishing.
Ter-Minasova, S. G. (2004). Language and Intercultural Communication. Moscow: Moscow State University Press.
Toporov, V. N. (1980). Symbolism and Mythology in Ancient Cultures. Moscow: Nauka Publishing.
Voloshinov, V. N., & Ryazanova, M. A. (2011). Philosophical Foundations of Linguistics: The Pythagorean School and Modern Thought. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sarvinoz Rashidova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.